Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23859581›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2013

Sex preferences in cardiovascular testing: the contribution of the patient-physician discussion.

Katie E Golden, Anna Marie Chang, Judd E Hollander

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. ASNC's thoughts on the AHA/ACC chest pain guidelines.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department (GRACE): Recurrent, low-risk chest pain in the emergency department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katie E GoldenDepartments of Emergency Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA. katie.eileen.golden@gmail.com
Anna Marie Chang
Judd E Hollander
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Oregon Multidisciplinary Training Program in Emergency Medicine Clinical ResearchK12HL108974 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI NEWGARD, CRAIG D. · 2011 to 2015
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS 1K12HL108974-01NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL108974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrior studies suggest that a decreased cardiac catheterization rate for women with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is partially attributed to gender differences in patient preferences for testing. The hypothesis was that these preferences are influenced by physician recommendations for cardiovascular testing.

methodsThis was a cohort study of patients who presented to an emergency department (ED) with chest pain. At the time of ED disposition, patients were surveyed to assess whether or not the doctor discussed the possibility of coronary artery disease (CAD), the physician's recommendations for diagnostic testing, and the patient's preferences for further testing. The survey was repeated at the time of discharge from the hospital if the patient was admitted and again at 30 days for all patients. The main outcome was patient-reported physician recommendation for testing, and the secondary outcome was patient preference for cardiovascular testing.

resultsThere were 206 patients enrolled (118 women, 88 men). Women were less likely than men to receive cardiac catheterization as inpatients (9.8% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.04). In the ED, women were less likely to be recommended for stress testing (8.5% vs. 19.3%, p = 0.02) or cardiac catheterization (4.2% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.02) or to see a cardiologist (8.5% vs. 22.7%, p < 0.01). As inpatients, women were more likely to be told that no further testing was needed (70.5% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.03). While there was higher incidence of prior CAD and myocardial infarction among the men in the study, analysis after removal of these patients did not alter results. Physicians were less likely to counsel women about diagnostic testing options in the ED (10.1% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.03), as inpatients (11.5% vs. 40.0%, p < 0.01), and as outpatients (26.1% vs. 48.6%, p = 0.04). No patients in the study refused their doctors' recommendations. Women were less likely to prefer catheterization in the ED (5.1% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.01) and were more likely to prefer no further testing as inpatients (60.7% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.02).

conclusionsWomen who presented to the ED with symptoms concerning for ACS reported lower rates of physician recommendation for cardiovascular testing, as well as lower rates of counseling regarding cardiac etiologies of their chest pain. These findings suggest sex differences in preference for cardiovascular testing may be partially explained by the discussions between women and their doctors.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEmergency Service, HospitalPhysician-Patient RelationsAcute Coronary SyndromeCardiac CatheterizationChest PainCohort StudiesCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseDecision MakingExercise TestFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeeds Assessment

Identifiers

PMID23859581
PMCPMC3810172
OpenAlexW2041389558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.