Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23859438›Full record

Trial reportPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2013

Patients as collaborators: using focus groups and feedback sessions to develop an interactive, web-based self-management intervention for chronic pain.

Sarah K Moore, Honoria Guarino, Michelle C Acosta, Ian David Aronson, Lisa A Marsch, Andrew Rosenblum, Michael J Grabinski, Dennis C Turk

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah K MooreNational Development and Research Institutes, New York, New York, USA.
Honoria Guarino
Michelle C Acosta
Ian David Aronson
Lisa A Marsch
Andrew Rosenblum
Michael J Grabinski
Dennis C Turk
National Development and Research Institutes · USDartmouth College · USRed Hat (United States) · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Treatment Development & Evaluation CoreP30DA029926 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Lisa A. Marsch · 2011 to 2026
$21.5M
Web-based CBT for Opioid-treated, Chronic Pain Patients with Aberrant BehaviorR01DA026887 · NIDA · NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI MARSCH, LISA A., ROSENBLUM, ANDREW BRUCE · 2010 to 2013
$2.3M
NIDA NIH HHS 1R01DA026887NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA029926NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the development of an interactive, web-based self-management intervention for opioid-treated, chronic pain patients with aberrant drug-related behavior.

methodsFifty-three chronic pain patients participated in either focus groups (N = 23) or individual feedback sessions (N = 30). Focus groups probed interest in and relevance of the planned content and structure of the program. Individual session participants reviewed draft program modules and provided feedback on acceptability, ease of use, and usefulness. Focus group transcripts were thematically analyzed, and summary statistics were performed on feedback data.

resultsFocus group participants stressed the need for additional pain management strategies and emphasized themes consistent with planned program content related to: 1) ambivalence about opioids; 2) reciprocal relationships among cognition, mood, and pain; 3) importance of recognizing physical limitations; and 4) effectiveness of goal setting for increasing motivation and functioning. Participants also offered insights on: 5) the loss of identity due to chronic pain; and 6) the desire to connect with pain peers to share strategies for managing daily life. Feedback session data demonstrate that participants believed that a web-based tool would be potentially useful and acceptable, and that exposure to program sections significantly increased participants' knowledge of key topics related to self-management of chronic pain.

conclusionsResults suggest the potential value of self-management for chronic pain patients and the potential acceptability of web-based delivery of intervention content. Focus group and feedback methodologies highlight the usefulness of including potential program users in intervention development.

Indexed as

InternetAgedChronic PainCognitive Behavioral TherapyFeedbackFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementSelf CareChronic PainCognitive-Behavior TherapyInternetSelf-Management

Identifiers

PMID23859438
PMCPMC3834126
OpenAlexW1931505281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.