Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23859029›Full record

SynthesisNutrition and cancer2013

Soy food consumption and lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis using a common measure across studies.

Sheng Hui Wu, Zhong Liu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrition and cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cancer Progress and Priorities: Lung Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Epidemiology and Genomics of Lung Cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sheng Hui WuDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37203-1738, USA. shenghuiwu@hotmail.com
Zhong Liu
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Cancer Risk Reduction and Diet: A Cohort Study of WomenR37CA070867 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZHENG, WEI · 2009 to 2013
$4.7M
Inflammatory Biomarkers and Colorectal Cancer RiskR01CA122364 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, GONG · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS N02CP1101066NCI NIH HHS R01 CA122364NCI NIH HHS R37CA070867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A published meta-analysis pooled individual studies by using the study-specific odds ratio (OR) or relative risk (RR) for the highest vs. lowest category of soy or isoflavone intake from each study, but it should be problematic to make comparison between studies/populations for lung cancer risk as the quantiles are so different from different studies/populations. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the association between exposure of estimated daily soy protein intake in grams and lung cancer risk. We extracted ORs or RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), converted them to the estimated ones for daily soy protein intake and pooled them using fixed or random effects models from 11 epidemiologic studies. Overall, the inverse association between daily grams of soy protein intake and risk of lung cancer was borderline statistically significant (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.96 to 1.00); the inverse association was statistically significant in nonsmokers (OR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.93 to 0.99) and stronger than in smokers (P for difference <0.05). No statistical significance for the associations was observed between genders, the origin of the participants, study design and types of soy intake. This study suggests a borderline reduction in risk of lung cancer with daily soy protein intake in grams, and a significant inverse association in nonsmokers.

Indexed as

DietSoy FoodsConfidence IntervalsDatabases, FactualHumansIsoflavonesLung NeoplasmsOdds RatioRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSmokingSoybean ProteinsIsoflavonesSoybean Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23859029
PMCPMC3858084
OpenAlexW2038116658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.