Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23858485›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2013

Evolution of cardiorespiratory interactions with age.

D Iatsenko, A Bernjak, T Stankovski, Y Shiogai, P J Owen-Lynch, P B M Clarkson, P V E McClintock, A Stefanovska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Synchronization-Dissipation in the Cardiorespiratory System.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Health risk assessment of PMScientific reports · 2021
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

D IatsenkoDepartment of Physics, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, UK.
A Bernjak
T Stankovski
Y Shiogai
P J Owen-Lynch
P B M Clarkson
P V E McClintock
A Stefanovska

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe an analysis of cardiac and respiratory time series recorded from 189 subjects of both genders aged 16-90. By application of the synchrosqueezed wavelet transform, we extract the respiratory and cardiac frequencies and phases with better time resolution than is possible with the marked events procedure. By treating the heart and respiration as coupled oscillators, we then apply a method based on Bayesian inference to find the underlying coupling parameters and their time dependence, deriving from them measures such as synchronization, coupling directionality and the relative contributions of different mechanisms. We report a detailed analysis of the reconstructed cardiorespiratory coupling function, its time evolution and age dependence. We show that the direct and indirect respiratory modulations of the heart rate both decrease with age, and that the cardiorespiratory coupling becomes less stable and more time-variable.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingBiological ClocksComputer SimulationFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedRespiratory RateYoung Adultageingcardiorespiratory interactionscoupled oscillatorscoupling functionphase coherencesynchronization

Identifiers

PMID23858485
PMCPMC4042892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.