Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23858100›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2013

Coronary vasomotor response to intracoronary acetylcholine injection, clinical features, and long-term prognosis in 873 consecutive patients with coronary spasm: analysis of a single-center study over 20 years.

Koji Sato, Koichi Kaikita, Naoki Nakayama, Eiji Horio, Hiromi Yoshimura, Takamichi Ono, Keisuke Ohba, Kenichi Tsujita, Sunao Kojima, Shinji Tayama and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02666235 (A Randomised Controlled Trial of the Effect of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning on Coronary Endothelial Function in Patients With Angina.), which is not on this map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02666235 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomised Controlled Trial of the Effect of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning on Coronary Endothelial Function in Patients With Angina.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNHS National Waiting Times Centre BoardRan2011 to 2016Enrolled60ConditionsIschemic Preconditioning, Coronary DiseaseArmsRemote ischaemic conditioning, Arm cuff placement, no inflation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Prognostic significance of individual COVADIS criteria in patients undergoing acetylcholine provocation testing.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Muscarinic control of cardiovascular function in humans: a review of current clinical evidence.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Koji SatoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Koichi Kaikita
Naoki Nakayama
Eiji Horio
Hiromi Yoshimura
Takamichi Ono
Keisuke Ohba
Kenichi Tsujita
Sunao Kojima
Shinji Tayama
Seiji Hokimoto
Kunihiko Matsui
Seigo Sugiyama
Hiroshige Yamabe
Hisao Ogawa
Kumamoto University · JPYamaguchi University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to elucidate the correlation between angiographic coronary vasomotor responses to intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) injection, clinical features, and long-term prognosis in patients with vasospastic angina (VSA). METHODS AND

resultsThis is a retrospective, observational, single-center study of 1877 consecutive patients who underwent ACh-provocation test between January 1991 and December 2010. ACh-provoked coronary spasm was observed in 873 of 1637 patients included in the present analysis. ACh-positive patients were more likely to be older male smokers with dyslipidemia, to have a family history of ischemic heart disease, and to have a comorbidity of coronary epicardial stenosis than were ACh-negative patients. ACh-positive patients were divided into 2 groups: those with focal (total or subtotal obstruction, n=511) and those with diffuse (severe diffuse vasoconstriction, n=362) spasm patterns. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified female sex and low comorbidity of coronary epicardial stenosis to correlate with the ACh-provoked diffuse spasm pattern in patients with VSA. Kaplan-Meier survival curve indicated better 5-year survival rates free from major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with diffuse spasm pattern compared with those with focal spasm pattern (P=0.019). Multivariable Cox hazard regression analysis identified diffuse spasm pattern as a negative predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with VSA.

conclusionsACh-induced diffuse coronary spasm was frequently observed in female VSA patients free of severe coronary epicardial stenosis and was associated with better prognosis than focal spasm. These results suggest the need to identify the ACh-provoked coronary spasm subtypes in patients with VSA.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineVasoconstrictor AgentsAgedAngina Pectoris, VariantChi-Square DistributionCoronary AngiographyCoronary VasospasmCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArterialJapanKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedAcetylcholineVasoconstrictor Agentsacetylcholine‐provocation testcoronary spasmdiffuse spasmprognosis

Identifiers

PMID23858100
PMCPMC3828805
OpenAlexW2168520292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.