Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23857856›Full record

Trial reportCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2013

Effect of a fixed-ratio (1:1:1) transfusion protocol versus laboratory-results-guided transfusion in patients with severe trauma: a randomized feasibility trial.

Bartolomeu Nascimento, Jeannie Callum, Homer Tien, Gordon Rubenfeld, Ruxandra Pinto, Yulia Lin, Sandro Rizoli

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00945542 (Formula-driven vs Laboratory-guided Transfusion Practices in Bleeding Trauma Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00945542 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Formula-driven vs Laboratory-guided Transfusion Practices in Bleeding Trauma Patients: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRan2009 to 2011Enrolled70ConditionsHemorrhagic Shock, Trauma CoagulopathyArmsMassive transfusion protocol, Standard of care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Blood transfusion strategies for major bleeding in trauma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Transfusion in trauma: empiric or guided therapy?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bartolomeu NascimentoDepartment of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Jeannie Callum
Homer Tien
Gordon Rubenfeld
Ruxandra Pinto
Yulia Lin
Sandro Rizoli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHemorrhage coupled with coagulopathy remains the leading cause of preventable in-hospital deaths among trauma patients. Use of a transfusion protocol with a predefined ratio of 1:1:1 (1 each of red blood cells [RBC], frozen plasma [FP] and platelets) has been associated with improved survival in retrospective studies in military and civilian settings, but such a protocol has its challenges and may increase the risk of respiratory complications. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the feasibility of a 1:1:1 transfusion protocol and its effect on mortality and complications among patients with severe trauma.

methodsWe included 78 patients seen in a tertiary trauma centre between July 2009 and October 2011 who had hypotension and bleeding and were expected to need massive transfusion (≥ 10 RBC units in 24 h). We randomly assigned them to either the fixed-ratio (1:1:1) transfusion protocol (n = 40) or to a laboratory-results-guided transfusion protocol (control; n = 38). The primary outcome, feasibility, was assessed in terms of blood product ratios and plasma wastage. Safety was measured based on 28-day mortality and survival free of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

resultsOverall, a transfusion ratio of 1:1:1 was achieved in 57% (21/37) of patients in the fixed-ratio group, as compared with 6% (2/32) in the control group. A ratio of 1:1 (RBC:FP) was achieved in 73% (27/37) in the fixed-ratio group and 22% (7/32) in the control group. Plasma wastage was higher with the intervention protocol (22% [86/390] of FP units v. 10% [30/289] in the control group). The 28-day mortality and number of days free of acute respiratory distress syndrome were statistically similar between the groups.

interpretationThe fixed-ratio transfusion protocol was feasible in our study, but it was associated with increased plasma wastage. Larger randomized trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of such a protocol in trauma care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT00945542.

Indexed as

AdultBlood TransfusionClinical ProtocolsExsanguinationFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRespiratory Distress SyndromeSurvival AnalysisTrauma CentersWounds and InjuriesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23857856
PMCPMC3761040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.