Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2013
Micafungin for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia: multicenter phase 2 study.
Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multicenter phase 2 study of empirical low-dose liposomal amphotericin B in patients with refractory febrile neutropenia.International journal of hematology · 2017Trial
- Preemptive Antifungal Therapy for Febrile Neutropenic Hematological Malignancy Patients in China.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Empirical antifungal therapy is the current standard of care for patients with febrile neutropenia unresponsive to broad-spectrum antimicrobials. Although a number of antifungal agents are currently available, the need remains for effective but less toxic alternatives for this indication. We therefore conducted a phase 2 study of micafungin for 80 patients with hematologic diseases who were suffering from persistent or recurrent fever after at least 96 h of antibacterial therapy. The patients were treated with micafungin at a fixed dose of 150 mg/day. Of the 78 evaluable patients, 54 (69 %) achieved defervescence by the time of neutrophil recovery, and 56 (72 %) completed the treatment in accordance with the provision of the protocol. Four patients developed invasive fungal infection, nine changed antifungal therapy because of lack of efficacy, and three discontinued micafungin because of drug-related adverse events. Based on the composite end point taking account of these, the overall treatment success rate was 60 %, with the lower limit of a 90 % confidence interval (50.3 %) exceeding the predefined threshold success rate (50 %). These findings show the efficacy and safety of micafungin for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent or recurrent febrile neutropenia, warranting further investigation of this drug in a phase 3 study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.