Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23857598›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2013

Quality colonoscopy and risk of interval cancer in Lynch syndrome.

J F Haanstra, H F A Vasen, S Sanduleanu, E J van der Wouden, J J Koornstra, J H Kleibeuker, W H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. A Focused Clinical Review of Lynch Syndrome.Cancer management and research · 2023
    Review
  13. Diagnosis and management of Lynch syndrome.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Features of incident colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome.United European gastroenterology journal · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

J F HaanstraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands, j.f.haanstra@umcg.nl.
H F A Vasen
S Sanduleanu
E J van der Wouden
J J Koornstra
J H Kleibeuker
W H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel
Isala · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLMaastricht University · NLNetherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite colonoscopic surveillance, Lynch syndrome patients develop colorectal cancer (CRC). Identification of modifiable factors has the potential to improve outcome of surveillance. The aims of this study were to determine (1) characteristics of patients with CRC, (2) endoscopic and histological features of these cancers, and (3) quality of the previous colonoscopy.

methodsApproximately 2,200 medical reports from proven and obligate mutation carriers identified at the Dutch Lynch Syndrome Registry and two large hospitals were retrospectively analyzed for the presence of an interval cancer defined as CRC diagnosed within 24 months of previous colonoscopy.

resultsThirty-one interval cancers were detected in 29 patients (median age of 52 [range 35-73]), after a median time of 17 months. All were MLH1 or MSH2 mutation carriers, and 39 % had a previous CRC. In patients without previous surgery for CRC, 84 % was proximally located. Of all interval cancers, 77 % were at local stage (T1-3N0Mx). In three patients (9 %) with an incomplete previous colonoscopy, CRC was located in the unexamined colon. In six of the nine patients with an adenoma during previous colonoscopy, the cancer was detected in the same colonic segment as the previously removed adenoma.

conclusionsInterval cancers were detected in MLH1 and MSH2 mutation carriers, especially in those with a history of previous CRC and between 40 and 60 years. Interval cancer could be related to incompleteness of previous endoscopy and possibly residual adenomatous tissue. Further reduction of the interval cancer risk may be achieved by optimizing endoscopy quality and individualization of surveillance guidelines.

Indexed as

AdultAgedColonoscopyColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID23857598
OpenAlexW2166432835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.