Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23857589›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2013

A conceptual and methodological framework for investigating etiologic heterogeneity.

Colin B Begg, Emily C Zabor, Jonine L Bernstein, Leslie Bernstein, Michael F Press, Venkatraman E Seshan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Can We Interpret Analyses of Etiologic Heterogeneity When Molecular Markers Are Used to Classify Tumors?Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. TP53 Pathway Function, Estrogen Receptor Status, and Breast Cancer Risk Factors in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Evidence for Etiologic Subtypes of Breast Cancer in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Colin B BeggDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, U.S.A.
Emily C Zabor
Jonine L Bernstein
Leslie Bernstein
Michael F Press
Venkatraman E Seshan

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Genome-Wide Association Study of Radiation Exposure and Bilateral Breast CancerR01CA129639 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI BERNSTEIN, JONINE L. · 2009 to 2013
$15.6M
Statistical Strategies for Establishing Etiologic Heterogeneity of TumorsR01CA163251 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI BEGG, COLIN B · 2012 to 2015
$1.5M
BREAST CANCER AND THE BIRTH CONTROL PILL-275933175N01HD033175 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · 1993 to 2003
$298k
NCI NIH HHS CA163251NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129639NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163251NICHD NIH HHS N01 HD33175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer has traditionally been studied using the disease site of origin as the organizing framework. However, recent advances in molecular genetics have begun to challenge this taxonomy, as detailed molecular profiling of tumors has led to discoveries of subsets of tumors that have profiles that possess distinct clinical and biological characteristics. This is increasingly leading to research that seeks to investigate whether these subtypes of tumors have distinct etiologies. However, research in this field has been opportunistic and anecdotal, typically involving the comparison of distributions of individual risk factors between tumors classified on the basis of candidate tumor characteristics. The purpose of this article is to place this area of investigation within a more general conceptual and analytic framework, with a view to providing more efficient and practical strategies for designing and analyzing epidemiologic studies to investigate etiologic heterogeneity. We propose a formal definition of etiologic heterogeneity and show how classifications of tumor subtypes with larger etiologic heterogeneities inevitably possess greater disease risk predictability overall. We outline analytic strategies for estimating the degree of etiologic heterogeneity among a set of subtypes and for choosing subtypes that optimize the heterogeneity, and we discuss technical challenges that require further methodologic research. We illustrate the ideas by using a pooled case-control study of breast cancer classified by expression patterns of genes known to define distinct tumor subtypes.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCluster AnalysisFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansBiomarkers, Tumorcancer epidemiologyclusteringetiologic heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID23857589
PMCPMC4104361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.