ReviewDrugs2013
Management of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension in patients with autonomic failure.
Review in Drugs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hemodynamic Effects of the Osmopressor Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of atomoxetine versus midodrine for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2020Trial
- Review
- Cardiovascular autonomic nervous system responses and orthostatic intolerance in astronauts and their relevance in daily medicine.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Review
- Dysautonomia: A Forgotten Condition - Part II.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2021Article
- Syncope and Headache.Current pain and headache reports · 2018Review
- Evaluating the effectiveness of atomoxetine for the treatment of primary orthostatic hypotension in adults.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018Review
- Pure Autonomic Failure.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016Review
- Supine hypertension in Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2016Article
- Drug therapies in older adults (part 2).Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2015Review
- Multiple system atrophy: using clinical pharmacology to reveal pathophysiology.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2015Article
- Review
- Droxidopa in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension.Expert review of cardiovascular therapy · 2015Article
- New developments in the management of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension.Current cardiology reports · 2014Review
- Orthostatic hypotension leading to recurrent syncope episodes in a hypertensive patient: Treatment with Tianma Gouteng Decoction.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The maintenance of blood pressure in the upright position requires intact autonomic cardiovascular reflexes. Diseases that affect the sympathetic innervation of the cardiovascular system result in a sustained fall in blood pressure upon standing (i.e., neurogenic orthostatic hypotension) that can impair the blood supply to the brain and other organs and cause considerable morbidity and mortality. Here we review treatment options for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and include an algorithm for its management that emphasizes the importance of non-pharmacologic measures and provides guidance on pharmacologic treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.