Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23857502›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2014

Exosomes: a new weapon to treat the central nervous system.

Luca Braccioli, Cindy van Velthoven, Cobi J Heijnen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Microglia Polarization: A Novel Target of Exosome for Stroke Treatment.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Stem Cell Extracellular Vesicles and their Potential to Contribute to the Repair of Damaged CNS Cells.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  12. The role of exosomes in stroke.Molecular biology reports · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. [Research advances in mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes in treatment of brain injury].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luca BraccioliLaboratory for Neuroimmunology and Developmental Origins of Disease (NIDOD), University Medical Center Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, 3584EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cindy van Velthoven
Cobi J Heijnen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential of exosomes to treat central nervous system (CNS) pathologies has been recently demonstrated. These studies make way for a complete new field that aims to exploit the natural characteristics of these vesicles, considered for a long time as side products of physiological cellular pathways. Recently, however, the biological significance of exosomes has been evaluated and exosomes can now be viewed upon as new relevant functional entities for development of novel therapeutic strategies. In this review, we aim to summarize the state-of-the-art role of exosomes in the CNS and to speculate about possible future therapeutic applications of exosomes. In particular, we will speculate about the use of these vesicles as a substitute of cell-based therapies for the treatment of brain damage and review the potential of exosomes as drug delivery vehicles for the CNS.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain DiseasesCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCentral Nervous SystemDrug Delivery SystemsExosomesHumansTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.