Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23857233›Full record

Trial reportCirculation2013

Preliminary experience with social media for community consultation and public disclosure in exception from informed consent trials.

Shannon W Stephens, Carolyn Williams, Randal Gray, Jeffrey D Kerby, Henry E Wang

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Circulation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Meeting unique requirements: Community consultation and public disclosure for research in emergency setting using exception from informed consent.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Getting Started: A Social Media Primer.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Using e-technologies in clinical trials.Contemporary clinical trials · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shannon W StephensDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama School of Medicine, OHB 251, 619 19th Ave, South Birmingham, AL 35294-7013, USA.
Carolyn Williams
Randal Gray
Jeffrey D Kerby
Henry E Wang

Funding

Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Data Coordinating CenterU01HL077863 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAY, SUSANNE · 2004 to 2015
$125.1M
Southeastern Resucitation Research CenterU01HL077881 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KERBY, JEFFREY D, WANG, HENRY E. · 2004 to 2015
$3.9M
CIHRNHLBI NIH HHS 5U01HL077863NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL077863NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL077881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

DisclosureInformed ConsentSocial MediaAdolescentAdultAdvertisingAgedAged, 80 and overAlabamaCardiopulmonary ResuscitationCommunity-Institutional RelationsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHeart ArrestHumansMalecardiopulmonary resuscitationcommunity networksethicsinformed consenttrauma

Identifiers

PMID23857233
PMCPMC3810951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.