Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23856984›Full record

ArticleCancer2013

Anatomic subsite of primary colorectal cancer and subsequent risk and distribution of second cancers.

Amanda I Phipps, Andrew T Chan, Shuji Ogino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda I PhippsDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Andrew T Chan
Shuji Ogino
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Pilot & Feasibility ProgramP30DK043351 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Ramnik J Xavier · 1991 to 2026
$35.3M
Cancer Prevention Trng-Nutrition, Exercise &GeneticsR25CA094880 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WHITE, EMILY · 2002 to 2016
$7.3M
Epigenetic Events and Colorectal Cancer EpidemiologyR01CA151993 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI OGINO, SHUJI · 2010 to 2014
$2.6M
Training and Research in Colon Cancer SurvivalK05CA152715 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI NEWCOMB, POLLY A · 2010 to 2019
$991k
Mentored Patient-Oriented Research in Digestive DiseasesK24DK098311 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHAN, ANDREW T · 2013 to 2017
$930k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA152715NCI NIH HHS K05-CA152715NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151993NCI NIH HHS R01-CA151993NCI NIH HHS R25 CA094880NCI NIH HHS R25-CA94880NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK098311NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK043351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with a history of colorectal cancer (CRC) have an increased risk of subsequent cancer. In this study, the authors used cancer registry data to evaluate whether this increased risk of cancer after CRC differed by anatomic subsite of a first CRC.

methodsIndividuals diagnosed with a first primary CRC between 1992 and 2009 were identified from 12 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by comparing the incidence of subsequent cancers in these patients who had an index CRC versus the cancer incidence rates in the general population. SIRs were calculated for cancers at anatomic sites within and outside the colorectum in analyses stratified by subsite of the index CRC.

resultsCancer incidence rates were significantly higher in individuals who had a previous CRC than in the general population (SIR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.13-1.16). Individuals with an index CRC located between the transverse and descending colon experienced the greatest increased risk both overall (SIR, 1.29-1.33) and particularly with respect to the risk of a second CRC (SIR, 2.53-3.35). The incidence of small intestinal cancer was elevated significantly regardless of the index CRC subsite (SIR, 4.31; 95% CI, 3.70-4.77), and the incidence of endometrial cancer was elevated in those who had an index CRC in the proximal colon (SIR, 1.37-1.79).

conclusionsThe risk of second cancer after CRC differs by anatomic site of the first tumor and is particularly pronounced for those with prior CRC located in the transverse to descending colon. The mechanisms underlying this pattern of second cancer risk remain unknown.

Indexed as

AdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Second PrimaryRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSEER ProgramUnited Statescolorectal cancermetachronous cancersecond cancerstandardized incidence ratiotumor subsite

Identifiers

PMID23856984
PMCPMC3775988
OpenAlexW1575008337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.