Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23856616›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2013

Spatial and temporal dynamics of neurite regrowth.

Naina Kurup, Panid Sharifnia, Yishi Jin

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naina KurupDivision of Biological Sciences, Section of Neurobiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Biology Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Panid Sharifnia
Yishi Jin
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Training Program in Basic Clinical GeneticsT32GM008666 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HAMILTON, BRUCE A · 1998 to 2021
$8.6M
GABAERGIC NEURON DIFFERENTIATION IN C ELEGANSR01NS035546 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI JIN, YISHI · 1996 to 2016
$5.3M
Development of a C. elegans model for axonal regenerationR01NS057317 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHISHOLM, ANDREW D · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008666NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS035546NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS057317PHS HHS R01035546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injury to mature neurites triggers a series of events that have both growth promoting and inhibitory roles. Recent evidence from a variety of experimental models has revealed new neuronal re-growth modulators. The action of these modulators must be precisely regulated both in time and space, and involves multiple cellular processes including retrograde signaling and local translation in the injured neurite. New genetic techniques, in combination with pharmacological approaches, have served to advance mechanistic dissection of neuronal response to injury. Better understanding of the spatio-temporal cues would greatly aid in the development of effective regenerative therapies.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesMicrotubulesNerve RegenerationNeuritesSignal TransductionMAP Kinase Kinase Kinasesmitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 12

Identifiers

PMID23856616
PMCPMC3833091
OpenAlexW2090009473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.