Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23853765›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2013

Update on anticytokine treatment for asthma.

Luca Gallelli, Maria Teresa Busceti, Alessandro Vatrella, Rosario Maselli, Girolamo Pelaia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect of Src tyrosine kinase on a rat model of asthma.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022
    Article
  2. Targeting TSLP in Asthma.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Potential new targets for drug development in severe asthma.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2018
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. From IgE to Omalizumab.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Role of biologics in severe eosinophilic asthma - focus on reslizumab.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luca GallelliDepartment of Health Science, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy. gallelli@unicz.it
Maria Teresa Busceti
Alessandro Vatrella
Rosario Maselli
Girolamo Pelaia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current advances in the knowledge of asthma pathobiology suggest that anticytokine therapies can be potentially useful for the treatment of this complex and heterogeneous airway disease. Recent evidence is accumulating in support of the efficacy of anti-IL-4, anti-IL-5, and anti-IL-13 drugs. Therefore, these new developments are now changing the global scenario of antiasthma therapies, especially with regard to more severe disease. Current findings referring to variability of individual therapeutic responses highlight that the different asthma subtypes need to be well characterized, in order to implement phenotype-targeted treatments which in the near future will hopefully be mainly based on cytokine-directed biologics.

Indexed as

AnimalsAsthmaBiological ProductsCytokinesHumansBiological ProductsCytokines

Identifiers

PMID23853765
PMCPMC3703384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.