Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23853552›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2013

The effect of intermittent antenatal iron supplementation on maternal and infant outcomes in rural Viet Nam: a cluster randomised trial.

Sarah Hanieh, Tran T Ha, Julie A Simpson, Gerard J Casey, Nguyen C Khuong, Dang D Thoang, Tran T Thuy, Sant-Rayn Pasricha, Thach D Tran, Tran Tuan and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Multiple-micronutrient supplementation for women during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Intermittent oral iron supplementation during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  15. Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah HaniehDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Tran T Ha
Julie A Simpson
Gerard J Casey
Nguyen C Khuong
Dang D Thoang
Tran T Thuy
Sant-Rayn Pasricha
Thach D Tran
Tran Tuan
Terence Dwyer
Jane Fisher
Beverley-Ann Biggs
Center for Environment and Community Assets Development · VNUniversity of Melbourne · AUGeneral Department of Preventive Medicine · VNMonash University · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnemia affects over 500 million women, and in pregnancy is associated with impaired maternal and infant outcomes. Intermittent antenatal iron supplementation is an attractive alternative to daily dosing; however, the impact of this strategy on infant outcomes remains unclear. We compared the effect of intermittent antenatal iron supplementation with daily iron supplementation on maternal and infant outcomes in rural Viet Nam. METHODS AND

findingsThis cluster randomised trial was conducted in Ha Nam province, Viet Nam. 1,258 pregnant women (< 16 wk gestation) in 104 communes were assigned to daily iron-folic acid (IFA), twice weekly IFA, or twice weekly multiple micronutrient (MMN) supplementation. Primary outcome was birth weight. Mean birth weight was 3,148 g (standard deviation 416). There was no difference in the birth weights of infants of women receiving twice weekly IFA compared to daily IFA (mean difference [MD] 28 g; 95% CI -22 to 78), or twice weekly MMN compared to daily IFA (MD -36.8 g; 95% CI -82 to 8.2). At 32 wk gestation, maternal ferritin was lower in women receiving twice weekly IFA compared to daily IFA (geometric mean ratio 0.73; 95% CI 0.67 to 0.80), and in women receiving twice weekly MMN compared to daily IFA (geometric mean ratio 0.62; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.68), but there was no difference in hemoglobin levels. Infants of mothers who received twice weekly IFA had higher cognitive scores at 6 mo of age compared to those who received daily IFA (MD 1.89; 95% CI 0.23 to 3.56).

conclusionsTwice weekly antenatal IFA or MMN did not produce a clinically important difference in birth weight, when compared to daily IFA supplementation. The significant improvement in infant cognitive outcomes at 6 mo of age following twice weekly antenatal IFA requires further exploration, and provides additional support for the use of intermittent, rather than daily, antenatal IFA in populations with low rates of iron deficiency.

trial registrationAustralia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry 12610000944033.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsRural PopulationAdultCapsulesFemaleGrowth and DevelopmentHemoglobinsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIronMedication AdherenceMicronutrientsOdds RatioPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeCapsulesHemoglobinsIronMicronutrientsTablets

Identifiers

PMID23853552
PMCPMC3708703
OpenAlexW2101589977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.