Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23852978›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems2012

Parameter estimation of a spiking silicon neuron.

Alexander Russell, Kevin Mazurek, Stefan Mihalaş, Ernst Niebur, Ralph Etienne-Cummings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Optimal solid state neurons.Nature communications · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexander RussellDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. alexrussell@jhu.edu
Kevin Mazurek
Stefan Mihalaş
Ernst Niebur
Ralph Etienne-Cummings

Funding

CRCNS-Attentional Selection and Perceptual OrganizationR01EY016281 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NIEBUR, ERNST · 2004 to 2012
$2.9M
NEI NIH HHS 5R01EY016281-02NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiking neuron models are used in a multitude of tasks ranging from understanding neural behavior at its most basic level to neuroprosthetics. Parameter estimation of a single neuron model, such that the model's output matches that of a biological neuron is an extremely important task. Hand tuning of parameters to obtain such behaviors is a difficult and time consuming process. This is further complicated when the neuron is instantiated in silicon (an attractive medium in which to implement these models) as fabrication imperfections make the task of parameter configuration more complex. In this paper we show two methods to automate the configuration of a silicon (hardware) neuron's parameters. First, we show how a Maximum Likelihood method can be applied to a leaky integrate and fire silicon neuron with spike induced currents to fit the neuron's output to desired spike times. We then show how a distance based method which approximates the negative log likelihood of the lognormal distribution can also be used to tune the neuron's parameters. We conclude that the distance based method is better suited for parameter configuration of silicon neurons due to its superior optimization speed.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsComputer SimulationLikelihood FunctionsMonte Carlo MethodNeuronsSiliconTime FactorsSilicon

Identifiers

PMID23852978
PMCPMC3712290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.