ReviewBMJ quality & safety2013
Use of health information technology to reduce diagnostic errors.
Review in BMJ quality & safety, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Managing diagnostic uncertainty in primary care: a systematic critical review.BMC family practice · 2017Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of Electronic Differential Diagnoses (DDX) Generators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Improving decision accuracy using a clinical decision support system for medical students during history-taking: a randomized clinical trial.BMC medical education · 2023Trial
- Effect of a cognitive aid on adherence to perioperative assessment and management guidelines for the cardiac evaluation of noncardiac surgical patients.Anesthesiology · 2014Trial
- A multi-institutional rapid qualitative assessment of factors supporting diagnostic excellence in hospital medicine.Journal of hospital medicine · 2026Article
- Wrong-side imaging orders: automated detection using electronic health record data - a retrospective cohort study.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Large language model-based scribing tools for ophthalmology: performance and safety evaluation using simulated clinical encounters.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Voices From the Frontline: A Qualitative Study of Nurses' Experiences With Documentation and Its Influence on Patient Safety.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Challenges and Patient Safety: The Critical Role of Accuracy - A Systematic Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Factors impacting clinical data and documentation quality in Australian aged care and disability services: a user-centred perspective.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Retrospective analysis of the human-centered design process used to develop a clinical decision support in the emergency department: PE Dx Study Part 2.Human factors in healthcare · 2023Article
- Post-implementation usability evaluation of a human factors-based clinical decision support for pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis (Dx): PE Dx Study Part 1.Human factors in healthcare · 2023Article
- Partnering with Patients and Families to Improve Diagnostic Safety through the OurDX Tool: Effects of Race, Ethnicity, and Language Preference.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- Optimizing the Quality of Clinical Data in an Australian Aged Care and Disability Service to Improve Care Delivery and Clinical Outcomes: Protocol for an Agile Lean Six Sigma Study.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Cohort study of diagnostic delay in the clinical pathway of patients with chronic wounds in the primary care setting.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Understanding barriers to diagnosis in a rare, genetic disease: Delays and errors in diagnosing schwannomatosis.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2022Review
- The Impact of Structured and Standardized Documentation on Documentation Quality; a Multicenter, Retrospective Study.Journal of medical systems · 2022Article
- Electronic health record-based patient tracking by emergency medicine physicians.AEM education and training · 2022Article
- Characteristics of Disease-Specific and Generic Diagnostic Pitfalls: A Qualitative Study.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- A Research Agenda for Diagnostic Excellence in Critical Care Medicine.Critical care clinics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth information technology (HIT) systems have the potential to reduce delayed, missed or incorrect diagnoses. We describe and classify the current state of diagnostic HIT and identify future research directions.
methodsA multi-pronged literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, backwards and forwards reference searches and contributions from domain experts. We included HIT systems evaluated in clinical and experimental settings as well as previous reviews, and excluded radiology computer-aided diagnosis, monitor alerts and alarms, and studies focused on disease staging and prognosis. Articles were organised within a conceptual framework of the diagnostic process and areas requiring further investigation were identified.
resultsHIT approaches, tools and algorithms were identified and organised into 10 categories related to those assisting: (1) information gathering; (2) information organisation and display; (3) differential diagnosis generation; (4) weighing of diagnoses; (5) generation of diagnostic plan; (6) access to diagnostic reference information; (7) facilitating follow-up; (8) screening for early detection in asymptomatic patients; (9) collaborative diagnosis; and (10) facilitating diagnostic feedback to clinicians. We found many studies characterising potential interventions, but relatively few evaluating the interventions in actual clinical settings and even fewer demonstrating clinical impact.
conclusionsDiagnostic HIT research is still in its early stages with few demonstrations of measurable clinical impact. Future efforts need to focus on: (1) improving methods and criteria for measurement of the diagnostic process using electronic data; (2) better usability and interfaces in electronic health records; (3) more meaningful incorporation of evidence-based diagnostic protocols within clinical workflows; and (4) systematic feedback of diagnostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.