Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23852374›Full record

ArticleCell death and differentiation2013

The DNA damage checkpoint precedes activation of ARF in response to escalating oncogenic stress during tumorigenesis.

K Evangelou, J Bartkova, A Kotsinas, I S Pateras, M Liontos, G Velimezi, M Kosar, T Liloglou, I P Trougakos, L Dyrskjot and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death and differentiation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Senescence and Osteogenesis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Review
  8. Mechanisms and Regulation of Cellular Senescence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Role of genomic instability in human carcinogenesis.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Inflammation, DNA Damage,Frontiers in genetics · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

K EvangelouMolecular Carcinogenesis Group, Department of Histology and Embryology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
J Bartkova
A Kotsinas
I S Pateras
M Liontos
G Velimezi
M Kosar
T Liloglou
I P Trougakos
L Dyrskjot
C L Andersen
M Papaioannou
Y Drosos
G Papafotiou
Z Hodny
B Sosa-Pineda
X-R Wu
A Klinakis
T Ørntoft
J Lukas
J Bartek
V G Gorgoulis
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRAarhus University Hospital · DKCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Molecular Genetics · CZBiomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens · GRSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USDanish Cancer Society · DKNew York University · USRoy Castle Lung Cancer Foundation · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Reagent/Service CoreP01CA165980 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI WU, XUE-RU · 2013 to 2023
$13.5M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA165980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncogenic stimuli trigger the DNA damage response (DDR) and induction of the alternative reading frame (ARF) tumor suppressor, both of which can activate the p53 pathway and provide intrinsic barriers to tumor progression. However, the respective timeframes and signal thresholds for ARF induction and DDR activation during tumorigenesis remain elusive. Here, these issues were addressed by analyses of mouse models of urinary bladder, colon, pancreatic and skin premalignant and malignant lesions. Consistently, ARF expression occurred at a later stage of tumor progression than activation of the DDR or p16(INK4A), a tumor-suppressor gene overlapping with ARF. Analogous results were obtained in several human clinical settings, including early and progressive lesions of the urinary bladder, head and neck, skin and pancreas. Mechanistic analyses of epithelial and fibroblast cell models exposed to various oncogenes showed that the delayed upregulation of ARF reflected a requirement for a higher, transcriptionally based threshold of oncogenic stress, elicited by at least two oncogenic 'hits', compared with lower activation threshold for DDR. We propose that relative to DDR activation, ARF provides a complementary and delayed barrier to tumor development, responding to more robust stimuli of escalating oncogenic overload.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCarcinogenesisDisease Models, AnimalDNA-Binding ProteinsGene ExpressionHeterograftsHumansImmunohistochemistryMiceMolecular Sequence DataNeoplasmsOncogenesTransfectionTumor Suppressor Protein p14ARFDNA-Binding ProteinsTumor Suppressor Protein p14ARF

Identifiers

PMID23852374
PMCPMC3792440
OpenAlexW2094522455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.