Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2013
No difference between computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year results of a prospective randomised study.
Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical outcomes associated with robotic and computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a machine learning-augmented systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022Pooled it
- No differences in mid- to long-term outcomes of computer-assisted navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020Pooled it
- Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016Pooled it
- Radiostereometric measurement of implant migration in robotically assisted vs conventional bi-cruciate stabilized cemented total knee arthroplasty: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.Acta orthopaedica · 2025Trial
- Similar outcomes in computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: ten-year results of a prospective randomized study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Trial
- Computer-Assisted Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020Trial
- No Benefit of Computer-assisted TKA: 10-year Results of a Prospective Randomized Study.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2018Trial
- Similar migration in computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty.Acta orthopaedica · 2017Trial
- A randomized controlled clinical and radiological trial about outcomes of navigation-assisted TKA compared to conventional TKA: long-term follow-up.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016Trial
- Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: no difference in implant survival at 15-year follow-up.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Short-term Outcomes of Unrestricted Kinematic Alignment: Total Knee Arthroplasty With a Medial Pivot Implant: A Japanese Multicenter Study.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Comparison of the accuracy and efficacy of different assistive techniques in primary total knee arthroplasty: A network meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Clinico-Radiological and Functional Results of the Navigated Gradius (Gradually Reducing Radius) Knee Prosthesis at Short to Mid-Term Follow-Up.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2021Article
- Computer Navigation-Assisted Knee Replacement Demonstrates Improved Outcome Compared with Conventional Knee Replacement at Mid-Term Follow-up: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2020Review
- Computer and robotic - assisted total knee arthroplasty: a review of outcomes.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2020Review
- CORR Insights®: No Benefit of Computer-assisted TKA: 10-year Results of a Prospective Randomized Study.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2018Article
- Encouraging treatment algorithm for computer-assisted navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA): A retrospective cohort analysis.Journal of orthopaedics · 2017Article
- Clinical outcome of increased flexion gap after total knee arthroplasty. Can controlled gap imbalance improve knee flexion?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017Article
- No differences in functional results and quality of life after single-radius or multiradius TKA.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016Article
- Computer-assisted navigation is beneficial both in primary and revision surgery with modular rotating-hinge knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe use of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) results in better limb and implant alignment compared to conventional TKA; however, it is unclear whether this translates to better mid- to long-term clinical outcome. This prospective randomised study comparing CAS and conventional TKA reports the functional and patient perceived outcomes at a follow-up of 5 years. The hypothesis was that there would be a difference in functional outcome or quality of life after mid-term follow-up.
methodsSixty-seven patients were available for physical and radiological examination at 5 years. The Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to describe functional outcome and the Euroquol questionnaire for quality of life.
resultsThe mean total KSS for the CAS group improved from 91.1 (SD 22.3) points preoperatively to 157.4 (SD 21.9) and 150.2 (SD 30.4) points at 2 and 5 years, respectively. In the conventional group, the mean total KSS was 99.6 (SD 18.6) points preoperatively and 151.1 (SD 26.0) and 149.0 (SD 28.0) points at 2 and 5 years, respectively. The mean quality of life score improved from 48.2 (SD 16.5) points preoperatively to 67.4 (SD 16.3) and 66.8 (SD 22.2) points at 2 and 5 years in the CAS group, and from 52.2 (SD 17.1) points preoperatively to 65.6 (SD 14.6) and 61.7 (SD 19.3) points at 2 and 5 years, respectively, in the conventional TKA group. These differences were not statistically significant. There were radiolucent lines up to 2 mm in 11 knees (four CAS, seven conventional), but there were no changes in implant position.
conclusionsThere were no significant differences in functional or patient perceived outcome after mid-term follow-up in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23851969What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.