ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2013
Effects of a three party healthcare network on the incidence levels of drug related problems.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deprescribing interventions and their impact on medication adherence in community-dwelling older adults with polypharmacy: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2019Pooled it
- Effect of medicines management versus standard care on readmissions in multimorbid patients: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2020Trial
- What makes a multidisciplinary medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people work well in primary care? A realist review and synthesis.BMC geriatrics · 2023Review
- An inventory of collaborative medication reviews for older adults - evolution of practices.BMC geriatrics · 2019Article
- General practitioner-pharmacist collaboration in Germany: an explanatory model.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2019Article
- Patient-perceived barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a medication review in primary care: a qualitative thematic analysis.BMC family practice · 2018Article
- Prevalence of drug interactions in elderly patients with multimorbidity in primary care.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2017Review
- Large scale implementation of clinical medication reviews in Dutch community pharmacies: drug-related problems and interventions.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDrug related problems (DRPs) are impairing patients' health and cause high costs. Neither delegation of home medication review nor regular pharmaceutical care are common in Germany.
objectiveWe aimed to reduce several DRP by the implementation of a three party healthcare team [AGnES-practice assistant, pharmacist, general practitioner (GP)] and adherence supporting strategies (using a medication reminder chart, medication compliance aid).
settingThe setting was ambulatory primary healthcare in German rural areas with a cohort of home-dwelling, elderly, mostly multimorbid patients with limited mobility (study period: 06/2006-12/2008).
methodsWe conducted a prospective non-randomized implementation cohort study with home medication review (home medication review module; mean participation time: 9 months). Data collection was delegated to additionally qualified AGnES-practice assistants (AGnES: GP-supporting, community-based, e-health-assisted systemic intervention). The intervention comprised pharmaceutical care by the local pharmacy in addition to medical interventions by the GP. 408 patients (mean age: women: 80.7 years; men: 75.3 years) received both pharmaceutical care and at least one follow-up visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Outcome measurements comprised self-reported DRPs, objectively evaluated DRP, and prevalence of adherence supporting strategies.
resultsThe three party healthcare team approach reduced self-reported forgetfulness (7.7-3.2 %; p = 0.001), the proportion of patients with intermittent drug intake (5.3-1.3 %; p < 0.001), and the proportion of patients with potentially clinical relevant drug-drug interaction (61.6-51.2 %; p < 0.001). Self-reported adverse drug reactions decreased non-significantly (5.4-4.6 %; p = 0.564; all tests χ²-McNemar). The median number of active substances taken was reduced from 8 to 7 (p < 0.001; Wilcoxon signed rank test). The proportions of patients using medication charts and compliance aids increased significantly (75.2-90.3 %; p < 0.001) and (70.0-80.1 %; p > 0.001), respectively.
conclusionThis is the first study evaluating effects of a three party team on DRPs in a primary healthcare setting in Germany. This approach led to reduction in the occurrence of several DRPs and improved adherence supporting strategies. However, the study is a pre-post analysis, and had no control group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23851929What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.