Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23851603›Full record

ArticleNature communications2013

Genome evolution predicts genetic interactions in protein complexes and reveals cancer drug targets.

Xiaowen Lu, Philip R Kensche, Martijn A Huynen, Richard A Notebaart

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Precision Oncology: The Road Ahead.Trends in molecular medicine · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Synthetic dosage lethality in the human metabolic network is highly predictive of tumor growth and cancer patient survival.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaowen LuDepartment of Bioinformatics, Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Philip R Kensche
Martijn A Huynen
Richard A Notebaart
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic interactions reveal insights into cellular function and can be used to identify drug targets. Here we construct a new model to predict negative genetic interactions in protein complexes by exploiting the evolutionary history of genes in parallel converging pathways in metabolism. We evaluate our model with protein complexes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and show that the predicted protein pairs more frequently have a negative genetic interaction than random proteins from the same complex. Furthermore, we apply our model to human protein complexes to predict novel cancer drug targets, and identify 20 candidate targets with empirical support and 10 novel targets amenable to further experimental validation. Our study illustrates that negative genetic interactions can be predicted by systematically exploring genome evolution, and that this is useful to identify novel anti-cancer drug targets.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticEvolution, MolecularGenome, FungalAntineoplastic AgentsHumansMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, GeneticMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsProtein Interaction MappingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSystems BiologyAntineoplastic AgentsNeoplasm ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23851603
PMCPMC3717498
OpenAlexW2164432702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.