Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23851023›Full record

ReviewExperimental eye research2014

A comparative analysis of Müller glia-mediated regeneration in the vertebrate retina.

Donika Gallina, Levi Todd, Andy J Fischer

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental eye research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Retinal Plasticity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Plasticity of cell proliferation in the retina ofCurrent research in neurobiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Donika GallinaDepartment of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 4190 Graves Hall, 333 West 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210-1239, USA.
Levi ToddDepartment of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 4190 Graves Hall, 333 West 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210-1239, USA.
Andy J FischerDepartment of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 4190 Graves Hall, 333 West 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210-1239, USA. Electronic address: fischer.412@osu.edu.

Funding

Muller glia: roles in retinal homeostasis and neuronal regenerationR01EY022030 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FISCHER, ANDY J · 2012 to 2021
$3.5M
NEI NIH HHS EY022030-01NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews the current state of knowledge regarding the potential of Müller glia to become neuronal progenitor cells in the avian retina. We compare and contrast the remarkable proliferative and neurogenic capacity of Müller glia in the fish retina to the limited capacity of Müller glia in avian and rodent retinas. We summarize recent findings regarding the secreted factors, signaling pathways and cell intrinsic factors that have been implicated in the formation of Müller glia-derived progenitors. We discuss several key similarities and differences between the fish, rodent and chick model systems, highlighting several of the key transcription factors and signaling pathways that regulate the formation of Müller glia-derived progenitors.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationEpendymoglial CellsHumansRegenerationRetinaSignal TransductionmicrogliaMüller gliaprogenitorregenerationretina

Identifiers

PMID23851023
PMCPMC3887127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.