Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23850704›Full record

ReviewDrug discovery today2013

Phenotypic screens as a renewed approach for drug discovery.

Wei Zheng, Natasha Thorne, John C McKew

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug discovery today, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 176 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
176citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

176 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Drug Discovery and Repurposing forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluation of Serum Supplementation on the Development ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. From Lab to Clinic: Success Stories of Repurposed Drugs in Treating Major Diseases.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Genomic strategies for drug repurposing.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wei ZhengNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 9800 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-3370, USA. Electronic address: wzheng@mail.nih.gov.
Natasha Thorne
John C McKew

Funding

Therapeutics for Rare and Neglected Diseases - ScienceZIBTR000002 · NCATS · NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES · PI MCKEW, JOHN · 2012 to 2014
$77.2M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 TR999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The significant reduction in the number of newly approved drugs in the past decade has been partially attributed to failures in discovery and validation of new targets. Evaluation of recently approved new drugs has revealed that the number of approved drugs discovered through phenotypic screens, an original drug screening paradigm, has exceeded those discovered through the molecular target-based approach. Phenotypic screening is thus gaining new momentum in drug discovery with the hope that this approach may revitalize drug discovery and improve the success rate of drug approval through the discovery of viable lead compounds and identification of novel drug targets.

Indexed as

Drug DesignMolecular Targeted TherapyAnimalsDrug ApprovalDrug DiscoveryDrug IndustryHumansPhenotypeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23850704
PMCPMC4531371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.