Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23850333›Full record

ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2014

The future of blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease.

Kim Henriksen, Sid E O'Bryant, Harald Hampel, John Q Trojanowski, Thomas J Montine, Andreas Jeromin, Kaj Blennow, Anders Lönneborg, Tony Wyss-Coray, Holly Soares and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 152 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
152citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

152 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 313 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. A multimodal model for clinically defined MCI integrating plasma biomarkers and brain microstructural features: a dual-cohort external validation study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

92 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.

Kim HenriksenNordic Bioscience Biomarkers and Research, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Herlev, Denmark. Electronic address: kh@nordicbioscience.com.
Sid E O'BryantDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Harald HampelDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
John Q TrojanowskiInstitute on Aging, Alzheimer's Disease Core Center, Udall Parkinson's Research Center, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Thomas J MontineDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andreas JerominNextGen Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kaj BlennowClinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Goteborg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Molndal, Sweden.
Anders LönneborgDiaGenic ASA, Oslo, Norway.
Tony Wyss-CorayDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Holly SoaresBristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT, USA.
Chantal BazenetKing's College London, Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, UK.
Magnus SjögrenDiaGenic ASA, Oslo, Norway.
William HuDepartment of Neurology, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Simon LovestoneKing's College London, Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, UK.
Morten A KarsdalNordic Bioscience Biomarkers and Research, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Herlev, Denmark.
Michael W WeinerDepartments of Medicine, Radiology, Psychiatry, and Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Blood-Based Biomarker Interest Group
King's College London · GBNel (Norway) · NONordic Bioscience (Denmark) · DKBristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USEmory University · USGoethe University Frankfurt · DEInstitute on Aging · USNextGen Aeronautics (United States) · USSahlgrenska University Hospital · SEStanford University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS OF INTRA-NASAL INSULIN DETEMIRP50AG005136 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JAYADEY, SUMAN · 1985 to 2019
$57.2M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
Udall Center Director's meeting poster awardP50NS062684 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MONTINE, THOMAS J · 2009 to 2020
$18.3M
A Blood-Based Screening Tool for Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG039389 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI O'BRYANT, SID E · 2012 to 2013
$608k
Medical Research Council G0801464NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005136NIA NIH HHS R01 AG039389NIA NIH HHS R01AG039389NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS062684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is significantly hampered by the lack of easily accessible biomarkers that can detect disease presence and predict disease risk reliably. Fluid biomarkers of AD currently provide indications of disease stage; however, they are not robust predictors of disease progression or treatment response, and most are measured in cerebrospinal fluid, which limits their applicability. With these aspects in mind, the aim of this article is to underscore the concerted efforts of the Blood-Based Biomarker Interest Group, an international working group of experts in the field. The points addressed include: (1) the major challenges in the development of blood-based biomarkers of AD, including patient heterogeneity, inclusion of the "right" control population, and the blood-brain barrier; (2) the need for a clear definition of the purpose of the individual markers (e.g., prognostic, diagnostic, or monitoring therapeutic efficacy); (3) a critical evaluation of the ongoing biomarker approaches; and (4) highlighting the need for standardization of preanalytical variables and analytical methodologies used by the field.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersDisease ProgressionHumansBiomarkersAlzheimer's diseaseBiomarkersBloodPlasmaSerum

Identifiers

PMID23850333
PMCPMC4128378
OpenAlexW1968790254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.