ArticleLancet (London, England)2013
Physical and cognitive functioning of people older than 90 years: a comparison of two Danish cohorts born 10 years apart.
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 161 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
161 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 376 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meditation for subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Dietary patterns and survival to 100 + years: an empty systematic review of cohort and case-control studies.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022Pooled it
- Temporal Trends in the Handgrip Strength of 2,592,714 Adults from 14 Countries Between 1960 and 2017: A Systematic Analysis.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Pooled it
- Cognitive, functional, physical, and nutritional status of the oldest old encountered in primary care: a systematic review.BMC family practice · 2020Pooled it
- Vitamin and mineral supplementation for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in mid and late life.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Primary prevention of dementia: from modifiable risk factors to a public brain health agenda?Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2018Pooled it
- Vitamin and mineral supplementation for preventing dementia or delaying cognitive decline in people with mild cognitive impairment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Leisure time physical activity and dementia risk: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.BMJ open · 2017Pooled it
- [Prevention of Alzheimer's dementia in Germany : A projection of the possible potential of reducing selected risk factors].Der Nervenarzt · 2016Pooled it
- Education and Risk of Dementia: Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.Molecular neurobiology · 2016Pooled it
- Population Priorities for Successful Aging: A Randomized Vignette Experiment.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2020Trial
- Socioeconomic Status and Poor Health Outcome at 10 Years of Follow-Up in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.PloS one · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Domain-specific trends in healthy life expectancy among Chinese older adults: Compression, expansion, and dynamic equilibrium.SSM - population health · 2026Article
- How a healthy lifestyle mediates socioeconomic inequities in healthy ageing and life expectancies: A 20-year cohort of older adults.Fundamental research · 2026Article
- Data-driven leisure-time physical activity trajectories of over 46 years and their associations with cognition in nonagenarians: a cohort study.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026Article
- Age at migration and cognitive functioning in later life: a cross-sectional study among older adults in India.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Changes in impaired physical function in older adults and the influences of physical activity: a population-based cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Ageing populations: new challenges in longevity.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Explaining higher functional disability in women compared to men among older adults - the Singapore Chinese Health Study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA rapidly increasing proportion of people in high-income countries are surviving into their tenth decade. Concern is widespread that the basis for this development is the survival of frail and disabled elderly people into very old age. To investigate this issue, we compared the cognitive and physical functioning of two cohorts of Danish nonagenarians, born 10 years apart.
methodsPeople in the first cohort were born in 1905 and assessed at age 93 years (n=2262); those in the second cohort were born in 1915 and assessed at age 95 years (n=1584). All cohort members were eligible irrespective of type of residence. Both cohorts were assessed by surveys that used the same design and assessment instrument, and had almost identical response rates (63%). Cognitive functioning was assessed by mini-mental state examination and a composite of five cognitive tests that are sensitive to age-related changes. Physical functioning was assessed by an activities of daily living score and by physical performance tests (grip strength, chair stand, and gait speed).
findingsThe chance of surviving from birth to age 93 years was 28% higher in the 1915 cohort than in the 1905 cohort (6·50% vs 5·06%), and the chance of reaching 95 years was 32% higher in 1915 cohort (3·93% vs 2·98%). The 1915 cohort scored significantly better on the mini-mental state examination than did the 1905 cohort (22·8 [SD 5·6] vs 21·4 [6·0]; p<0·0001), with a substantially higher proportion of participants obtaining maximum scores (28-30 points; 277 [23%] vs 235 [13%]; p<0·0001). Similarly, the cognitive composite score was significantly better in the 1915 than in the 1905 cohort (0·49 [SD 3·6] vs 0·01 [SD 3·6]; p=0·0003). The cohorts did not differ consistently in the physical performance tests, but the 1915 cohort had significantly better activities of daily living scores than did the 1905 cohort (2·0 [SD 0·8] vs 1·8 [0·7]; p<0·0001).
interpretationDespite being 2 years older at assessment, the 1915 cohort scored significantly better than the 1905 cohort on both the cognitive tests and the activities of daily living score, which suggests that more people are living to older ages with better overall functioning.
fundingDanish National Research Foundation; US National Institutes of Health-National Institute on Aging; Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation; VELUX Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.