ArticlePhilosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM2013
Rethinking psychiatry with OMICS science in the age of personalized P5 medicine: ready for psychiatome?
Article in Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The prospects of precision psychiatry.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2021Article
- 'Omics' of suicidal behaviour: A path to personalised psychiatry.World journal of psychiatry · 2021Review
- Jumping on the Train of Personalized Medicine: A Primer for Non- Geneticist Clinicians: Part 3. Clinical Applications in the Personalized Medicine Area.Current psychiatry reviews · 2014Article
- Incorporating and integrating cognitive event-related potentials in the management of psychiatric disorders.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2014Article
- Situating Nutri-Ethics at the Junction of Nutrigenomics and Nutriproteomics in Postgenomics Medicine.Current pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2013Article
- Machine Learning based Psychology: Advocating for A Data-Driven Approach.International journal of psychological researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.