Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23849601›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in virology2013

Interrogating the relationship between naïve and immune antiviral T cell repertoires.

Nicole L La Gruta, Paul G Thomas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in virology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicole L La GrutaDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. nllg@unimelb.edu.au
Paul G Thomas

Funding

Quantifying and modeling influenza viral dynamics and host responsesR56AI091938 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI THOMAS, PAUL G. · 2011 to 2011
$648k
Immunodominance hierarchies and compensation in influenza specific CD8+ T cell reK22AI077714 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI THOMAS, PAUL G. · 2009 to 2010
$270k
NIAID NIH HHS AI077714NIAID NIH HHS AI091938NIAID NIH HHS HHSN266200700005CNIAID NIH HHS K22 AI077714NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI091938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how naïve virus-specific CD8+ T cells influence the type of immune response generated after virus infection is critical for the development of enhanced therapeutic and vaccination strategies to exploit CD8+ T cell-mediated immunity. Recent technological advances in T cell isolation and T receptor sequencing have allowed for greater understanding of the basic structure of immune T cell repertoires, the diversity of responses within and between individuals, and changes in repertoires over time and in response to infection conditions. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of how T cell repertoires contribute to potent antiviral responses. Additionally we compare the state of the art in receptor sequencing, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the three most common approaches: next-generation sequencing, template-switch anchored RT-PCR, and multiplex single cell PCR. Finally, we describe how TCR sequencing has delineated the relationship between naïve and immune T cell repertoires.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiviral AgentsHumansImmunity, CellularReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesVirus DiseasesVirusesAntiviral AgentsReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID23849601
PMCPMC3779657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.