Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23849209›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2013

Reasons for and against receiving influenza vaccination in a working age population in Japan: a national cross-sectional study.

Tsubasa Iwasa, Koji Wada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Comparison between the Predictors of Vaccine Uptake Intentions for Influenza and Dengue.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  14. Cross-Cultural Household Influence on Vaccination Decisions.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A review of factors affecting vaccine preventable disease in Japan.Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tsubasa Iwasa
Koji WadaDepartment of Public Health, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan. kwada-sgy@umin.ac.jp.
Kitasato University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo improve influenza vaccination coverage in the working age population, it is necessary to understand the current status and awareness of influenza vaccination. This study aimed to determine influenza vaccination coverage in Japan and reasons for receiving the vaccine or not.

methodsAn anonymous internet-based survey was performed in September 2011. Our target study size was 3,000 participants between 20 and 69 years of age, with approximately 300 men and 300 women in each of five age groups (20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60-69). We asked the history of influenza vaccine uptake in the previous year, and reasons for having vaccination or not.

resultsThere were 3,129 respondents, of whom 24.2% of males and 27.6% of females received influenza vaccination between October 2010 and March 2011. Among those who were vaccinated, the main reasons for receiving the influenza vaccine were "Wanted to avoid becoming infected with influenza virus" (males: 84.0%; females: 82.6%) and "Even if infected with influenza, wanted to prevent the symptoms from becoming serious" (males: 60.7%; females: 66.4%). Among those not vaccinated, the most frequent reasons for not receiving the influenza vaccine included "No time to visit a medical institution" (males: 32.0%; females: 22.4%) and "Unlikely to become infected with influenza" (males: 25.1%; females: 22.7%).

conclusionsThe reasons for receiving the influenza vaccine varied between age groups and between sexes. To heighten awareness of influenza vaccination among unvaccinated working age participants, different intervention approaches according to sex and age group may be necessary.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfluenza VaccinesVaccinationAdultAgedAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionFemaleHumansInfluenza, HumanJapanMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsYoung AdultInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID23849209
PMCPMC3718666
OpenAlexW2164660001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.