Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23849201›Full record

ArticleNeuron2013

Sparse and background-invariant coding of vocalizations in auditory scenes.

David M Schneider, Sarah M N Woolley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Auditory Representation of Vocal Signals in a Pallial Cortical Circuit.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Distinct Cortical Populations Drive Multisensory Modulation of Segregated Auditory Sources.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Interference of Mid-level Speech and Noise Statistics Underlies Human Speech Recognition Sensitivity in Natural Environmental Noise.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Detection of Individual Differences Encoded in Sequential Variations of Elements in Zebra Finch Songs.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  17. The Temporal Organization of Learned Vocal Behavior Is Predicted by Species Rather Than Experience.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  18. A Complex Acoustical Environment During Development Enhances Auditory Perception and Coding Efficiency in the Zebra Finch.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Noise schemas aid hearing in noise.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David M SchneiderProgram in Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Sarah M N Woolley

Funding

Neural Coding and Perception of Learned VocalizationsR01DC009810 · NIDCD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI WOOLLEY, SARAH M · 2010 to 2020
$3.5M
Discrimination of communication sounds in auditory scenesF31DC010301 · NIDCD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI SCHNEIDER, DAVID MICHAEL · 2009 to 2012
$115k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC010301NIDCD NIH HHS F31-DC010301NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009810NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC009810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vocal communicators such as humans and songbirds readily recognize individual vocalizations, even in distracting auditory environments. This perceptual ability is likely subserved by auditory neurons whose spiking responses to individual vocalizations are minimally affected by background sounds. However, auditory neurons that produce background-invariant responses to vocalizations in auditory scenes have not been found. Here, we describe a population of neurons in the zebra finch auditory cortex that represent vocalizations with a sparse code and that maintain their vocalization-like firing patterns in levels of background sound that permit behavioral recognition. These same neurons decrease or stop spiking in levels of background sound that preclude behavioral recognition. In contrast, upstream neurons represent vocalizations with dense and background-corrupted responses. We provide experimental evidence suggesting that sparse coding is mediated by feedforward suppression. Finally, we show through simulations that feedforward inhibition can transform a dense representation of vocalizations into a sparse and background-invariant representation.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionBrain MappingFinchesNeuronsPattern Recognition, PhysiologicalVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID23849201
PMCPMC3713513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.