Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23849199›Full record

ArticleNeuron2013

Modular use of peripheral input channels tunes motion-detecting circuitry.

Marion Silies, Daryl M Gohl, Yvette E Fisher, Limor Freifeld, Damon A Clark, Thomas R Clandinin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Imprecision in Vision: Lessons From Neural Circuits in the Fly.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Afterimages drive a shared visual motion-reversal illusion inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. On analogies in vertebrate and insect visual systems.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  6. Broken time-reversal symmetry in visual motion detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Broken time reversal symmetry in visual motion detection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. A recurrent neural circuit inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Model organisms and systems in neuroethology: one hundred years of history and a look into the future.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Fine-grained descending control of steering in walkingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marion SiliesDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Daryl M Gohl
Yvette E Fisher
Limor Freifeld
Damon A Clark
Thomas R Clandinin
Stanford University · US

Funding

Training Program in Basic NeuroscienceT32MH020016 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Justin L Gardner, Merritt C Maduke · 1997 to 2026
$16.2M
Dissecting the functional anatomy of the visual system: a new way forwardDP1OD003530 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CLANDININ, THOMAS ROBERT · 2007 to 2011
$3.9M
Dissecting Neural Circuit Computations in the Peripheral Visual SystemR01EY022638 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CLANDININ, THOMAS ROBERT · 2012 to 2021
$3.5M
Identification of the neural circuitry underlying motion vision in DrosophilaF32EY020040 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOHL, DARYL · 2010 to 2013
$161k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY020040NEI NIH HHS F32EY020040NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022638NIH HHS DP1 OD003530NIMH NIH HHS 5 T32 MH020016-14NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the visual system, peripheral processing circuits are often tuned to specific stimulus features. How this selectivity arises and how these circuits are organized to inform specific visual behaviors is incompletely understood. Using forward genetics and quantitative behavioral studies, we uncover an input channel to motion detecting circuitry in Drosophila. The second-order neuron L3 acts combinatorially with two previously known inputs, L1 and L2, to inform circuits specialized to detect moving light and dark edges. In vivo calcium imaging of L3, combined with neuronal silencing experiments, suggests a neural mechanism to achieve selectivity for moving dark edges. We further demonstrate that different innate behaviors, turning and forward movement, can be independently modulated by visual motion. These two behaviors make use of different combinations of input channels. Such modular use of input channels to achieve feature extraction and behavioral specialization likely represents a general principle in sensory systems.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBehavior, AnimalCalciumDrosophilaModels, NeurologicalMotion PerceptionNerve NetNeuronsPhotic StimulationVisual PathwaysCalcium

Identifiers

PMID23849199
PMCPMC3713415
OpenAlexW2017498277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.