ReviewBMC cancer2013
Resolving breast cancer heterogeneity by searching reliable protein cancer biomarkers in the breast fluid secretome.
Review in BMC cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02121873 (The Breast Duct), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Breast Duct: Pilot Study of Genomic Sequencing of Exfoliated Ductal Cells Obtained Through Endoscopy and Lavage
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nipple aspirate fluid-A liquid biopsy for diagnosing breast health.Proteomics. Clinical applications · 2017Trial
- Elevated expression of ELK1 promotes breast cancer cell growth and correlates with poor prognosis of breast cancer patients.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Article
- Nipple Aspirate Fluid at a Glance.Cancers · 2021Review
- The changing microRNA landscape by color and cloudiness: a cautionary tale for nipple aspirate fluid biomarker analysis.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2021Article
- The cancer cell secretome drives cooperative manipulation of the tumour microenvironment to accelerate tumourigenesis.Faculty reviews · 2021Review
- Early and late endothelial response in breast cancer metastasis in mice: simultaneous quantification of endothelial biomarkers using a mass spectrometry-based method.Disease models & mechanisms · 2019Article
- Serum miRNA-based distinct clusters define three groups of breast cancer patients with different clinicopathological and immune characteristics.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2019Article
- Single-Cell Mass Spectrometry Reveals Changes in Lipid and Metabolite Expression in RAW 264.7 Cells upon Lipopolysaccharide Stimulation.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2018Article
- Evaluation of nipple aspirate fluid as a diagnostic tool for early detection of breast cancer.Clinical proteomics · 2018Review
- Metabolomic profiling of breast tumors using ductal fluid.International journal of oncology · 2016Article
- Loss of the tumor suppressor spinophilin (PPP1R9B) increases the cancer stem cell population in breast tumors.Oncogene · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne of the major goals in cancer research is to find and evaluate the early presence of biomarkers in human fluids and tissues. To resolve the complex cell heterogeneity of a tumor mass, it will be useful to characterize the intricate biomolecular composition of tumor microenvironment (the so called cancer secretome), validating secreted proteins as early biomarkers of cancer initiation and progression. This approach is not broadly applicable because of the paucity of well validated and FDA-approved biomarkers and because most of the candidate biomarkers are mainly organ-specific rather than tumor-specific. For these reasons, there is an urgent need to identify and validate a panel of biomarker combinations for early detection of human tumors. This is especially important for breast cancer, the cancer spread most worldwide among women. It is well known that patients with early diagnosed breast cancer live longer, require less extensive treatment and fare better than patients with more aggressive and/or advanced disease.
resultsIn the frame of searching breast cancer biomarkers (especially using nipple aspirate fluid mirroring breast microenvironment), studies have highlighted an optimal combination of well-known biomarkers: uPA + PAI-1 + TF. When individually investigated they did not show perfect accuracy in predicting the presence of breast cancer, whereas the triple combination has been demonstrated to be highly predictive of pre-cancer and/or cancerous conditions, approaching 97-100% accuracy.
conclusionDespite the heterogeneous composition of breast cancer and the difficulties to find specific breast cancer biomolecules, the noninvasive analysis of the nipple aspirate fluid secretome may significantly improve the discovery of promising biomarkers, helping also the differentiation among benign and invasive breast diseases, opening new frontiers in early oncoproteomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.