ArticleClinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH2013
Antidepressant Medication Use Among Patients with Depression: Comparison between Usual Care and Collaborative Care Using Care Managers.
Article in Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A stepped-wedge evaluation of an initiative to spread the collaborative care model for depression in primary care.Annals of family medicine · 2015Trial
- Article
- A Systematic Framework for Analyzing Observation Data in Patient-Centered Registries: Case Study for Patients With Depression.JMIR research protocols · 2020Article
- Anxiety and Depression Among Women Living with HIV: Prevalence and Correlations.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2020Article
- Depression and HIV Disease Progression: A Mini-Review.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2019Review
- Care of the dialysis patient: Primary provider involvement and resource utilization patterns - a cohort study.BMC nephrology · 2017Article
- Utilization of a mental health collaborative care model among patients who require interpreter services.International journal of mental health systems · 2016Article
- Primary Care Clinicians' Attitudes on Digital Care Collaborative Management for Substance Use Disorders.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression poses a significant economic and health burden, yet it remains underdiagnosed and inadequately treated. The STAR*D trial funded by the National Institute of Mental Health showed that more than one antidepressant medication is often necessary to achieve disease remission among patients seen in both psychiatric and primary care settings. The collaborative care model (CCM), using care managers, has been shown to be effective in numerous studies in achieving sustained outcomes in depression management compared to usual care. This model was adopted in a statewide depression treatment improvement initiative among primary care clinics in Minnesota, which was launched in March 2008. In this study, records of patients who were enrolled in CCM from March 2008 until March 2009 were reviewed and compared to those under usual care. Patients who were followed under the CCM had a significantly greater number of antidepressant medication utilizations when compared to those under usual care. After 6 months, mean PHQ-9 score of patients under CCM was statistically lower than those in usual care. There was no significant difference in both mean PHQ-9 scores at 6 months and antidepressant utilization between the 2 groups among patients aged 65 years and older.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.