Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23847102›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2013

Widespread purifying selection on RNA structure in mammals.

Martin A Smith, Tanja Gesell, Peter F Stadler, John S Mattick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. G-quadruplexes from non-coding RNAs.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Evolutionary Conservation of RNA Secondary Structure.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Genomic and functional conservation of lncRNAs: lessons from flies.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Evolutionary divergence ofRNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Circulating MicroRNAs as Cancer Biomarkers in Liquid Biopsies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Martin A SmithRNA Biology and Plasticity Laboratory, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010 Australia, Genomics and Computational Biology Division, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, 306 Carmody Rd, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4067 Australia, Department of Structural and Computational Biology; and Center for Integrative Bioinformatics Vienna (CIBIV), Max F. Perutz Laboratories (MFPL), University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, A-1030 Vienna, Austria, Bioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science; and Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, University of Leipzig, Härtelstrasse 16-18, D-04107 Leipzig, Germany, Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Inselstraße 22, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany, Center for Non-coding RNA in Technology and Health, Department of Basic Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 3, 1870 Frederiksberg C Denmark, Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Rd, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA and St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Level 5, de Lacy, Victoria St, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2010 Australia.
Tanja Gesell
Peter F Stadler
John S Mattick
University of Copenhagen · DKMedical University of Vienna · ATUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionarily conserved RNA secondary structures are a robust indicator of purifying selection and, consequently, molecular function. Evaluating their genome-wide occurrence through comparative genomics has consistently been plagued by high false-positive rates and divergent predictions. We present a novel benchmarking pipeline aimed at calibrating the precision of genome-wide scans for consensus RNA structure prediction. The benchmarking data obtained from two refined structure prediction algorithms, RNAz and SISSIz, were then analyzed to fine-tune the parameters of an optimized workflow for genomic sliding window screens. When applied to consistency-based multiple genome alignments of 35 mammals, our approach confidently identifies >4 million evolutionarily constrained RNA structures using a conservative sensitivity threshold that entails historically low false discovery rates for such analyses (5-22%). These predictions comprise 13.6% of the human genome, 88% of which fall outside any known sequence-constrained element, suggesting that a large proportion of the mammalian genome is functional. As an example, our findings identify both known and novel conserved RNA structure motifs in the long noncoding RNA MALAT1. This study provides an extensive set of functional transcriptomic annotations that will assist researchers in uncovering the precise mechanisms underlying the developmental ontologies of higher eukaryotes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBase SequenceEvolution, MolecularGenome, HumanGenomicsHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid ConformationRNA, Long NoncodingMALAT1 long non-coding RNA, humanRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID23847102
PMCPMC3783177
OpenAlexW2169601480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.