Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23847101›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2013

Widespread evidence of cooperative DNA binding by transcription factors in Drosophila development.

Majid Kazemian, Hannah Pham, Scot A Wolfe, Michael H Brodsky, Saurabh Sinha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Strand asymmetries across genomic processes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. TF-COMB - Discovering grammar of transcription factor binding sites.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Majid KazemianDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA, Laboratory of Molecular Immunology and Immunology Center, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, MD, USA, Program in Gene Function and Expression, University of Massachusetts Medical School, MA, USA, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology University of Massachusetts Medical School, MA, USA, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, MA, USA and Institute of Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Hannah Pham
Scot A Wolfe
Michael H Brodsky
Saurabh Sinha
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Systematic Analysis of Drosophila transcription factor binding specificitiesR01HG004744 · NHGRI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BRODSKY, MICHAEL H, WOLFE, SCOT A · 2008 to 2010
$1.9M
High sensitivity discovery of cis-regulatory modulesR01GM085233 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HALFON, MARC S, SINHA, SAURABH · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004744-01NIGMS NIH HHS GM085233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulation of eukaryotic gene transcription is often combinatorial in nature, with multiple transcription factors (TFs) regulating common target genes, often through direct or indirect mutual interactions. Many individual examples of cooperative binding by directly interacting TFs have been identified, but it remains unclear how pervasive this mechanism is during animal development. Cooperative TF binding should be manifest in genomic sequences as biased arrangements of TF-binding sites. Here, we explore the extent and diversity of such arrangements related to gene regulation during Drosophila embryogenesis. We used the DNA-binding specificities of 322 TFs along with chromatin accessibility information to identify enriched spacing and orientation patterns of TF-binding site pairs. We developed a new statistical approach for this task, specifically designed to accurately assess inter-site spacing biases while accounting for the phenomenon of homotypic site clustering commonly observed in developmental regulatory regions. We observed a large number of short-range distance preferences between TF-binding site pairs, including examples where the preference depends on the relative orientation of the binding sites. To test whether these binding site patterns reflect physical interactions between the corresponding TFs, we analyzed 27 TF pairs whose binding sites exhibited short distance preferences. In vitro protein-protein binding experiments revealed that >65% of these TF pairs can directly interact with each other. For five pairs, we further demonstrate that they bind cooperatively to DNA if both sites are present with the preferred spacing. This study demonstrates how DNA-binding motifs can be used to produce a comprehensive map of sequence signatures for different mechanisms of combinatorial TF action.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryonic DevelopmentGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenomicsProtein BindingSequence Analysis, DNATranscription FactorsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23847101
PMCPMC3783179
OpenAlexW2112164159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.