ArticleNucleic acids research2013
Widespread evidence of cooperative DNA binding by transcription factors in Drosophila development.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natural variation in regulatory code revealed through Bayesian analysis of plant pan-genomes and pan-transcriptomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Vostok: A looping factor for the organization of the regulatory genome in the Drosophila brain.Molecular cell · 2025Article
- CelEst: a unified gene regulatory network for estimating transcription factor activities in C. elegans.Genetics · 2025Article
- Asymmetry of Motif Conservation Within Their Homotypic Pairs Distinguishes DNA-Binding Domains of Target Transcription Factors in ChIP-Seq Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Generating information-dense promoter sequences with optimal string packing.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Exploring gene regulatory interaction networks and predicting therapeutic molecules for hypopharyngeal cancer and EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma.FEBS open bio · 2024Article
- Peak Scores Significantly Depend on the Relationships between Contextual Signals in ChIP-Seq Peaks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Prediction of cooperative homeodomain DNA binding sites from high-throughput-SELEX data.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Strand asymmetries across genomic processes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Detecting clusters of transcription factors based on a nonhomogeneous poisson process model.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Nonparametric single-cell multiomic characterization of trio relationships between transcription factors, target genes, and cis-regulatory regions.Cell systems · 2022Article
- Article
- TF-COMB - Discovering grammar of transcription factor binding sites.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Article
- Statistical estimates of multiple transcription factors binding in the model plant genomes based on ChIP-seq data.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Interrogating cell type-specific cooperation of transcriptional regulators in 3D chromatin.iScience · 2021Article
- Toward a mechanistic understanding of DNA binding by forkhead transcription factors and its perturbation by pathogenic mutations.Nucleic acids research · 2021Review
- Deciphering enhancer sequence using thermodynamics-based models and convolutional neural networks.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Molecular competition can shape enhancer activity in theiScience · 2021Article
- Learning and interpreting the gene regulatory grammar in a deep learning framework.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Regulation of eukaryotic gene transcription is often combinatorial in nature, with multiple transcription factors (TFs) regulating common target genes, often through direct or indirect mutual interactions. Many individual examples of cooperative binding by directly interacting TFs have been identified, but it remains unclear how pervasive this mechanism is during animal development. Cooperative TF binding should be manifest in genomic sequences as biased arrangements of TF-binding sites. Here, we explore the extent and diversity of such arrangements related to gene regulation during Drosophila embryogenesis. We used the DNA-binding specificities of 322 TFs along with chromatin accessibility information to identify enriched spacing and orientation patterns of TF-binding site pairs. We developed a new statistical approach for this task, specifically designed to accurately assess inter-site spacing biases while accounting for the phenomenon of homotypic site clustering commonly observed in developmental regulatory regions. We observed a large number of short-range distance preferences between TF-binding site pairs, including examples where the preference depends on the relative orientation of the binding sites. To test whether these binding site patterns reflect physical interactions between the corresponding TFs, we analyzed 27 TF pairs whose binding sites exhibited short distance preferences. In vitro protein-protein binding experiments revealed that >65% of these TF pairs can directly interact with each other. For five pairs, we further demonstrate that they bind cooperatively to DNA if both sites are present with the preferred spacing. This study demonstrates how DNA-binding motifs can be used to produce a comprehensive map of sequence signatures for different mechanisms of combinatorial TF action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.