Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23846374›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2013

What does the future hold for the treatment of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy; will 'keratoplasty' still be a valid procedure?

M Bruinsma, C M Tong, G R J Melles

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Corneal injury: Clinical and molecular aspects.Experimental eye research · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fuchs fuchs Fuch's and Fuchs'!Eye (London, England) · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M BruinsmaNetherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
C M Tong
G R J Melles
Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery · NLRotterdam Eye Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is a well recognized corneal disorder characterized by the presence of collagenous warts extending from Descemet membrane (guttae) and endothelial cellular dysfunction due to cell loss and/or degeneration. Because of the characteristic abnormal cell morphology as seen with specular microscopy as well as the limited regenerative capacity in vivo, the endothelial cells were considered to be 'dystrophic'. Hence, FECD is commonly managed by replacement of the endothelium with donor tissue by means of a penetrating or endothelial keratoplasty. The latter procedure has now been refined to the isolated transplantation of a donor Descemet membrane and its endothelium, referred to as Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Unexpectedly, clinical observation made after DMEK seemed to challenge the current concept of the state of the endothelium in FECD; we actually observed an important role for the 'dystrophic' host endothelium in re-endothelialization of the denuded DM, and subsequent corneal clearance. In addition, recent studies regarding the pathophysiology of FECD made us realize that the endothelial cells are not 'dystrophic' per se, but in the course of time may have acquired a dysfunction instead. This paper describes the rationale behind this new concept and based on this, discusses the possibilities for future, less invasive treatment modalities for FECD.

Indexed as

CorneaCorneal TransplantationDescemet MembraneEndothelium, CornealFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyHumansWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID23846374
PMCPMC3806561
OpenAlexW2089657691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.