Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23846288›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurovirology2014

Innate immune response to La Crosse virus infection.

Katherine G Taylor, Karin E Peterson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurovirology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Current Status of La Crosse Virus in North America and Potential for Future Spread.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Review
  4. La Crosse Virus Neuroinvasive Disease in Children: A Contemporary Analysis of Clinical/Neurobehavioral Outcomes and Predictors of Disease Severity.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katherine G TaylorRocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 903 S 4th St, Hamilton, MT, 59840, USA, katherine.taylor@nih.gov.
Karin E Peterson

Funding

Mechanisms of Viral Pathogenesis in the Central Nervous SystemZIAAI001102 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI PETERSON, KARIN · 2009 to 2025
$16.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viral encephalitis represents a significant, and costly, public health threat particularly for high-risk pediatric populations. An emerging mosquito-borne pathogen endemic to the United States, La Crosse virus (LACV) is one of the most common causes of viral encephalitis in children in the United States. However, no licensed therapeutics or vaccines currently exist for treatment. Hampering development efforts, the host response to LACV and its role in disease pathogenesis has only recently been examined. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of innate immune response in the context of viral pathogenesis and host susceptibility to LACV. In addition, we address the need for a clearer understanding of the early host-virus interactions in LACV infections as it relates to viral pathogenesis in the central nervous system.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateAedesAnimalsCentral Nervous SystemChildDisease ReservoirsDisease SusceptibilityDisease VectorsEncephalitis, CaliforniaHost-Pathogen InteractionsHost SpecificityHumansInterferon Type ILa Crosse virusMiceInterferon Type I

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.