Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23846129›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2013

Utilization of neural stem cell-derived models to study anesthesia-related toxicity and preventative approaches.

Cheng Wang, Fang Liu, Tucker A Patterson, Merle G Paule, William Slikker

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cheng WangDivision of Neurotoxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR)/FDA, Jefferson, AR, USA, Cheng.Wang@fda.hhs.gov.
Fang Liu
Tucker A Patterson
Merle G Paule
William Slikker
National Center for Toxicological Research · USOffice of the Director · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early-life stress has been shown in both preclinical and clinical studies to cause neuroanatomical and biological alterations and disruptions in homeostasis. These alterations can lead to dysfunction in critical regulatory systems and concomitant increases in risk for the development of pathology. The existing data from research using in vivo animal models have implicated some general anesthetics as being toxic to the developing brain and causing cognitive deficits later in life. Because of obvious limitations, it is not possible to thoroughly explore the effects of early-life stress-e.g., prolonged exposure to anesthetic agents-on neurons in vivo in human infants or children. However, the availability of stem cell-derived models, especially human embryonic neural stem cells, along with their capacity for proliferation and ability to differentiate, has provided a potentially invaluable tool for examining the developmental effects of anesthetic agents in vitro. This review focuses on how embryonic neural stem cells, when combined with biochemical, pathological, and pharmacokinetic assessments, might serve as a bridging platform to provide the most expeditious approaches toward decreasing the uncertainty in extrapolating preclinical data to the human condition. This review presents key concepts in stem cell biology with respect to the nervous system, presents an overview of neural development, and summarizes the involvement of neural cell types in developmental neurotoxicity associated with anesthetic exposure.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnesthesiaAnimalsHumansMolecular ImagingNeural Stem CellsNeurotoxicity Syndromes

Identifiers

PMID23846129
OpenAlexW2040486960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.