Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23845102›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2013

Diagnostic and treatment delay, quality of life and satisfaction with care in colorectal cancer patients: a study protocol.

Salvador Pita-Fernández, Sonia Pértega-Díaz, Beatriz López-Calviño, Teresa Seoane-Pillado, Esther Gago-García, Rocío Seijo-Bestilleiro, Paloma González-Santamaría, Alejandro Pazos-Sierra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Turkish Validation and Reliability of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 Quality of Life Scale for Colorectal Cancer.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Waiting times for prostate cancer: A review.Journal of public health research · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Salvador Pita-FernándezClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, Universidade de A Coruña, Hotel de Pacientes 7a Planta, As Xubias 84, A Coruña, Spain. salvador.pita.fernandez@sergas.es
Sonia Pértega-Díaz
Beatriz López-Calviño
Teresa Seoane-Pillado
Esther Gago-García
Rocío Seijo-Bestilleiro
Paloma González-Santamaría
Alejandro Pazos-Sierra

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to recent improvements in colorectal cancer survival, patient-reported outcomes, including health-related quality of life and satisfaction with care, have become well-established endpoints to determine the impact of the disease on the lives of patients.The aim of this study is to determine prospectively, in a cohort of colorectal cancer incident cases: a) health-related quality of life, b) satisfaction with hospital-based care, and c) functional status. A secondary objective is to determine whether diagnostic/therapeutic delay influence quality of life or patients' satisfaction levels. METHODS/

designSingle-centre prospective follow-up study of colorectal cancer patients diagnosed during the period 2011-2012 (n = 375).This project was approved by the corresponding ethics review board, and informed consent is obtained from each patient. After diagnosis, patients are interviewed by a trained nurse, obtaining information on sociodemographic characteristics, family history of cancer, first symptoms, symptom perception and reaction to early symptoms. Quality of life is assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires, and patients' satisfaction with care is determined using the EORTC IN-PATSAT32. Functional status is measured with the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale.Clinical records are also reviewed to collect information on comorbidity, tumour characteristics, treatment, hospital consultations and exploratory procedures.Symptoms-to-diagnosis interval is defined as the time from the date of first symptoms until the cytohistological confirmation of cancer. Treatment delay is defined as the time between diagnosis and surgical treatment.All the patients will be followed-up for a maximum of 2 years. For survivors, assessments will be re-evaluated at one and two years after the diagnosis.Multiple linear/logistic regression models will be used to identify variables associated with the patients' functional status, quality of life and satisfaction with care score. Changes in quality of life over time will be analysed with linear mixed-effects regression models. DISCUSSION: The results will provide a deeper understanding of the impact of colorectal cancer from a more patient-centred approach, allowing us to identify groups of patients in need of additional attention, as well as areas for improvement. Special attention will be given to the relationship between diagnostic/therapeutic delay and patients' quality of life and satisfaction with the care received.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeColorectal NeoplasmsFollow-Up StudiesHealth StatusHumansProspective StudiesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID23845102
PMCPMC3710493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.