Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23844125›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Targeted enrichment: maximizing orthologous gene comparisons across deep evolutionary time.

Shannon M Hedtke, Matthew J Morgan, David C Cannatella, David M Hillis

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Assexon: Assembling Exon Using Gene Capture Data.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. An Exon-Capture System for the Entire Class Ophiuroidea.Molecular biology and evolution · 2016
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shannon M HedtkeDepartment of Integrative Biology and Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America. shannon.hedtke@gmail.com
Matthew J Morgan
David C Cannatella
David M Hillis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimated phylogenies of evolutionarily diverse taxa will be well supported and more likely to be historically accurate when the analysis contains large amounts of data-many genes sequenced across many taxa. Inferring such phylogenies for non-model organisms is challenging given limited resources for whole-genome sequencing. We take advantage of genomic data from a single species to test the limits of hybridization-based enrichment of hundreds of exons across frog species that diverged up to 250 million years ago. Enrichment success for a given species depends greatly on the divergence time between it and the reference species, and the resulting alignment contains a significant proportion of missing data. However, our alignment generates a well-supported phylogeny of frogs, suggesting that this technique is a practical solution towards resolving relationships across deep evolutionary time.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic VariationAnimalsAnuraExonsGenomePhylogenySequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID23844125
PMCPMC3699465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.