Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23843997›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Variation in salamander tail regeneration is associated with genetic factors that determine tail morphology.

Gareth J Voss, D Kevin Kump, John A Walker, S Randal Voss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Regeneration Toolkit.Developmental cell · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The clinical use of regenerative therapy in COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2014
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gareth J VossDepartment of Biology & Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America. srvoss@uky.edu
D Kevin Kump
John A Walker
S Randal Voss
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Research Resources for Model AmphibiansR24OD010435 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI SMITH, JERAMIAH JAMES, VOSS, STEPHEN RANDAL · 2012 to 2025
$5.7M
GENOME RESOURCES FOR MODEL AMPHIBIANSR24RR016344 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI VOSS, STEPHEN RANDAL · 2002 to 2011
$3.5M
Validation of a Novel Genetic Model for Neural RegenerationRC2NS069480 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SCOTT, EDWARD W · 2009 to 2010
$2.1M
NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR016344NCRR NIH HHS R24-RR016344NIH HHS R24 OD010435NIH HHS R24-OD010435NINDS NIH HHS RC2 NS069480NINDS NIH HHS RC2-NS069480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Very little is known about the factors that cause variation in regenerative potential within and between species. Here, we used a genetic approach to identify heritable genetic factors that explain variation in tail regenerative outgrowth. A hybrid ambystomatid salamander (Ambystoma mexicanum x A. andersoni) was crossed to an A. mexicanum and 217 offspring were induced to undergo metamorphosis and attain terrestrial adult morphology using thyroid hormone. Following metamorphosis, each salamander's tail tip was amputated and allowed to regenerate, and then amputated a second time and allowed to regenerate. Also, DNA was isolated from all individuals and genotypes were determined for 187 molecular markers distributed throughout the genome. The area of tissue that regenerated after the first and second amputations was highly positively correlated across males and females. Males presented wider tails and regenerated more tail tissue during both episodes of regeneration. Approximately 66-68% of the variation in regenerative outgrowth was explained by tail width, while tail length and genetic sex did not explain a significant amount of variation. A small effect QTL was identified as having a sex-independent effect on tail regeneration, but this QTL was only identified for the first episode of regeneration. Several molecular markers significantly affected regenerative outgrowth during both episodes of regeneration, but the effect sizes were small (<4%) and correlated with tail width. The results show that ambysex and minor effect QTL explain variation in adult tail morphology and importantly, tail width. In turn, tail width at the amputation plane largely determines the rate of regenerative outgrowth. Because amputations in this study were made at approximately the same position of the tail, our results resolve an outstanding question in regenerative biology: regenerative outgrowth positively co-varies as a function of tail width at the amputation site.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaudataFemaleGenetic MarkersLod ScoreMaleQuantitative Trait LociRegenerationTailGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID23843997
PMCPMC3700982
OpenAlexW2063834784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.