Iron supplementation in pregnancy.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Patterns of Smoking Behaviour in Low-Income Pregnant Women: A Cohort Study of Differential Effects on Infant Birth Weight.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
   Article
2. Is Routine Iron Supplementation Necessary in Pregnant Women With High Hemoglobin?Iranian Red Crescent medical journal · 2016
   Article
3. Iron bioavailability from commercially available iron supplements.European journal of nutrition · 2015
   Article
4. Incidence and risk factors of preterm birth in a rural Bangladeshi cohort.BMC pediatrics · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Healthy pregnant women still don't need routine iron supplementation.2013
• Commented on by
  Author's reply to Steer.2013
• Comment on
  Anaemia, prenatal iron use, and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.2013

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as