Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23843526›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

Amodal processing in human prefrontal cortex.

Benjamin J Tamber-Rosenau, Paul E Dux, Michael N Tombu, Christopher L Asplund, René Marois

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Extended Frontal Networks for Visual and Auditory Working Memory.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sensory-Biased and Multiple-Demand Processing in Human Lateral Frontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Parsing the Behavioral and Brain Mechanisms of Third-Party Punishment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Benjamin J Tamber-RosenauDepartment of Psychology, and Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA. benjamin.j.tamber-rosenau@vanderbilt.edu
Paul E Dux
Michael N Tombu
Christopher L Asplund
René Marois
Vanderbilt University · USDefence Research and Development Canada · CAUniversity of Queensland · AUYale-NUS College · SG

Funding

Shop Module CoreP30EY008126 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Kevin L Schey · 1989 to 2026
$19.6M
Training in Fundamental NeuroscienceT32MH064913 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI IHRIE, REBECCA A, WINDER, DANNY G. · 2001 to 2022
$7.6M
Training in Vision ResearchT32EY007135 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GEOFFREY F WOODMAN · 1994 to 2026
$5.8M
Capacity Limits in Multi-TaskingR01MH070776 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MAROIS, RENE · 2004 to 2008
$1.7M
NEI NIH HHS 5T32 EY007135NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008126NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007135NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH070776NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH 70776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information enters the cortex via modality-specific sensory regions, whereas actions are produced by modality-specific motor regions. Intervening central stages of information processing map sensation to behavior. Humans perform this central processing in a flexible, abstract manner such that sensory information in any modality can lead to response via any motor system. Cognitive theories account for such flexible behavior by positing amodal central information processing (e.g., "central executive," Baddeley and Hitch, 1974; "supervisory attentional system," Norman and Shallice, 1986; "response selection bottleneck," Pashler, 1994). However, the extent to which brain regions embodying central mechanisms of information processing are amodal remains unclear. Here we apply multivariate pattern analysis to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to compare response selection, a cognitive process widely believed to recruit an amodal central resource across sensory and motor modalities. We show that most frontal and parietal cortical areas known to activate across a wide variety of tasks code modality, casting doubt on the notion that these regions embody a central processor devoid of modality representation. Importantly, regions of anterior insula and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex consistently failed to code modality across four experiments. However, these areas code at least one other task dimension, process (instantiated as response selection vs response execution), ensuring that failure to find coding of modality is not driven by insensitivity of multivariate pattern analysis in these regions. We conclude that abstract encoding of information modality is primarily a property of subregions of the prefrontal cortex.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAuditory PerceptionBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMental ProcessesPhotic StimulationPrefrontal CortexPsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23843526
PMCPMC3724542
OpenAlexW2092747797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.