ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013
A combined disk test for direct differentiation of carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae in surveillance rectal swabs.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Broxyquinoline enhances antibacterial activity of colistin and attenuates LPS-induced inflammation.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Early trajectories of antibiotic exposure and colonization pressure and risk of ICU-acquired carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: A prospective cohort study.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- A Review on the Current and Future State of Urinary Tract Infection Diagnostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Global Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance of Klebsiella Pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC)-Producing Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates: A Review.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- REL/DPA/AVI method: a novel approach for rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales directly from positive blood cultures based on optical density.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of infection control measures informed by a modified Blue-Carba test in reducing rectal carriage of carbapenemase-producing bacteria in general wards: a prospective interrupted time series study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- CTX-M-127 with I176F mutations found in bacteria isolates from Bangladeshi circulating banknotes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Development and Validation of a Novel Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Rapid Detection of Carbapenemase Genes in Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2024Article
- Propranolol restores susceptibility of XDR Gram-negative pathogens to meropenem and Meropenem combination has been evaluated with either tigecycline or amikacin.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
- Detecting KPC-2 and NDM-1 Coexpression in Klebsiella pneumoniae Complex from Human and Animal Hosts in South America.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Insights on the performance of phenotypic tests versus genotypic tests for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli in resource-limited settings.BMC microbiology · 2022Article
- Emergence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- NMPA-approved traditional Chinese medicine-Pingwei Pill: new indication for colistin recovery against MCR-positive bacteria infection.Chinese medicine · 2021Article
- Rapid Detection and Differentiation of KPC and MBL Carbapenemases among Enterobacterales Isolates by a Modified Combined-Disk Test.Polish journal of microbiology · 2021Article
- Genomic Analysis of CarbapenemaseMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Antibiogram and Genetic Characterization of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens Incriminated in Healthcare-Associated Infections.Infection and drug resistance · 2020Article
- Performance of modified carbapenem inactivation method and inhibitor-based combined disk test in the detection and distinguishing of carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Pathogens and Detection of Carbapenemases inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Fecal Carriage and Epidemiology of Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2019Article
- Modified Carba NP Test: Simple and rapid method to differentiate KPC- and MBL-producing Klebsiella species.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are rapidly spreading worldwide. Early detection of fecal CPE carriers is essential for effective infection control. Here, we evaluated the performance of a meropenem combined disk test (CDT) for rapidly differentiating CPE isolates directly from rectal swabs. The screening method was applied for 189 rectal swabs from hospitalized patients at high risk for CPE carriage. Swabs were suspended in 1 ml saline and cultured for confluent growth onto a MacConkey agar plate with a meropenem (MER) disk alone, a MER disk plus phenyl boronic acid (PBA), a MER disk plus EDTA, and a MER disk plus PBA and EDTA. An inhibition zone of ≤ 25 mm around the MER disk alone indicated carriage of carbapenem-resistant organisms. Furthermore, ≥ 5-mm differences in the inhibition zone between MER disks without and with the inhibitors (PBA, EDTA, or both) were considered positive results for detecting Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), metallo-β-lactamase (MBL), or both carbapenemases, respectively. For comparison, rectal suspensions were tested using MacConkey plates with ertapenem (MacERT) disks and PCR (PCR-S) for carbapenemase genes. Of the 189 samples, 97 were genotypically confirmed as CPE positive by one of the three protocols tested. The CDT, MacERT disks, and PCR-S assays exhibited sensitivities of 94.8%, 96.9%, and 94.8% and specificities of 100%, 98.9%, and 100%, respectively, for detecting CPE-positive swabs. Moreover, the CDT correctly differentiated the production of KPC, MBL, or both carbapenemases in 78 of the 97 (80.4%) CPE-positive rectal swabs. Our results demonstrate that the CDT may provide a simple and inexpensive method for detecting and differentiating the carbapenemase type within a single day without requiring further testing and additional delay, supporting the timely implementation of infection control measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.