Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23843486›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013

A combined disk test for direct differentiation of carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae in surveillance rectal swabs.

Spyros Pournaras, Olympia Zarkotou, Aggeliki Poulou, Ioulia Kristo, Georgia Vrioni, Katerina Themeli-Digalaki, Athanassios Tsakris

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Emergence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genomic Analysis of CarbapenemaseMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Fecal Carriage and Epidemiology of Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Spyros PournarasDepartment of Microbiology, Medical School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece. spournaras@med.uoa.gr
Olympia Zarkotou
Aggeliki Poulou
Ioulia Kristo
Georgia Vrioni
Katerina Themeli-Digalaki
Athanassios Tsakris
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRTzaneion General Hospital · GRGeneral Hospital of Serres · GRUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are rapidly spreading worldwide. Early detection of fecal CPE carriers is essential for effective infection control. Here, we evaluated the performance of a meropenem combined disk test (CDT) for rapidly differentiating CPE isolates directly from rectal swabs. The screening method was applied for 189 rectal swabs from hospitalized patients at high risk for CPE carriage. Swabs were suspended in 1 ml saline and cultured for confluent growth onto a MacConkey agar plate with a meropenem (MER) disk alone, a MER disk plus phenyl boronic acid (PBA), a MER disk plus EDTA, and a MER disk plus PBA and EDTA. An inhibition zone of ≤ 25 mm around the MER disk alone indicated carriage of carbapenem-resistant organisms. Furthermore, ≥ 5-mm differences in the inhibition zone between MER disks without and with the inhibitors (PBA, EDTA, or both) were considered positive results for detecting Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), metallo-β-lactamase (MBL), or both carbapenemases, respectively. For comparison, rectal suspensions were tested using MacConkey plates with ertapenem (MacERT) disks and PCR (PCR-S) for carbapenemase genes. Of the 189 samples, 97 were genotypically confirmed as CPE positive by one of the three protocols tested. The CDT, MacERT disks, and PCR-S assays exhibited sensitivities of 94.8%, 96.9%, and 94.8% and specificities of 100%, 98.9%, and 100%, respectively, for detecting CPE-positive swabs. Moreover, the CDT correctly differentiated the production of KPC, MBL, or both carbapenemases in 78 of the 97 (80.4%) CPE-positive rectal swabs. Our results demonstrate that the CDT may provide a simple and inexpensive method for detecting and differentiating the carbapenemase type within a single day without requiring further testing and additional delay, supporting the timely implementation of infection control measures.

Indexed as

Bacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCosts and Cost AnalysisEnterobacteriaceaeEpidemiological MonitoringFecesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsTime FactorsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseCarbapenems

Identifiers

PMID23843486
PMCPMC3754636
OpenAlexW2104320233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.