ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics2013
Implications of genetic testing in noncompaction/hypertrabeculation.
Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Compaction Ventricle and Associated Cardiovascular and Non-Cardiovascular Diseases; More Attention Is Needed!Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Genetic Testing in Pediatric Left Ventricular Noncompaction.Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics · 2017Article
- Inherited cardiomyopathies.Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Noncompaction/hypertrabeculation is increasingly being recognized in children and adults, yet we understand little about the causes of disease. Genes associated with noncompaction/hypertrabeculation have been identified, but how can these assist in clinical management? Genomic technologies have also expanded tremendously, making testing more comprehensive, but they also present new questions given the tremendous diversity of phenotypes and variability of genomes. Here we present genetic evaluation strategies and assess clinical testing options for noncompaction/hypertrabeculation. We assess genes/gene panels offered by clinical laboratories and the potential for high-throughput sequencing to fuel further discovery. We discuss challenges in cardiovascular genetics, such as interpretation of genomic variants, prediction and disease penetrance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.