ArticleNeuroradiology2013
Effect of region-of-interest placement in bolus tracking cerebral computed tomography angiography.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Image-Based Prior Knowledge-Free Approach for a Multi-Material Decomposition in Photon-Counting Computed Tomography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Application of bolus tracking: The effect of ROI positions on the images quality of cervicocerebral CT angiography.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Optimal placement of the region of interest for bolus tracking on brain computed tomography angiography in Beagle dogs.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPremature or delayed triggering of semiautomatic contrast tracking during intracranial computed tomographic angiography can occur due to artifact from dense contrast in the superior vena cava or brachiocephalic veins near the anterior aortic arch. We determine if placement of bolus tracking region-of-interest in the posterior thoracic aorta can prevent suboptimal intracranial arterial opacification.
methodsIntracranial computed tomography angiographies from 80 patients performed on the same scanner were retrospectively evaluated. Thirty-seven consecutive patients with bolus tracking region-of-interest (ROI) placed in the anterior thoracic aorta (group A) and 43 consecutive patients with ROI placed in the posterior thoracic arch (group B) were identified. Two neuroradiologists scored the quality of intracranial computed tomography angiography on a four-point scale. Quantitative measurement of intracranial arterial opacification was also performed. The proportions of patients with poorest quality score as well as the proportions of the patients with the worst degree of intracranial arterial opacification (<10th percentile) were compared between groups A and B using two-sample proportion test.
resultsQualitative evaluation of the intracranial computed tomography angiography showed 4 (11%) patients in group A with poor quality (score of 1), while all patients in group B scored 2 or higher (p = 0.028). Seven (19%) patients in group A had the lowest quantitative score (mean arterial opacification < 10th percentile) while 1 (2.5%) patient in group B had the lowest score (p = 0.018).
conclusionBolus tracking in the posterior thoracic aorta reduces the chance of suboptimal intracranial computed tomography angiography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.