Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23842731›Full record

ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2013

Distal myopathies: from clinical classification to molecular understanding.

Torsten Kraya, Stephan Zierz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Distal myopathies.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Torsten KrayaDepartment of Neurology, University of Halle/Saale, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany. torsten.kraya@medizin.uni-halle.de
Stephan Zierz
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The distal myopathies are a group of rare diseases that in the past were primarily classified by eponyms. Classification criteria were the beginning of the disease, the distribution of the muscle weakness, the course of the disease, the prognosis, and histological changes in the muscle biopsy. Advances of molecular genetics have identified various genes and mutations in many of the clinical phenotypes. This led to modifications and extensions of the existing clinical classification. Our own study on 42 patients with distal myopathy including 15 patients from six families with matrin-3 mutation suggests that in distal myopathies (1) there seem to be no monogenetic classical phenotypes; (2) there are phenotypes with different genotypes and (3) phenotypes with genotypes that are usually associated with other than distal phenotypes. Some of these phenotypes could not be classified according to the traditional clinical classification. In matrin-3 associated myopathy most but not all patients had predominant distal weakness. Also in the initial families distal weakness myopathy was associated with vocal cord and pharyngeal weakness, this was observed in half of our patients. Three of 15 patients met the criteria of Welander-phenotype. The recent classification by Udd distinguishes major groups of myopathies based on age of onset, mode of inheritance, and morphological changes in muscle biopsy. In many but not all subforms of these major groups the genotype has been established so far.

Indexed as

MutationDistal MyopathiesHumansMuscle ProteinsPhenotypeMuscle Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23842731
OpenAlexW2125737999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.