Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23842718›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2013

Use of a novel technology to track adherence to product use in a microbicide trial of short duration (MTN-007).

Cheng-Shiun Leu, Marina Mabragaña, Rebecca Giguere, Curtis Dolezal, Alex Carballo-Diéguez, Ian McGowan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01232803 (A Phase 1 Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Rectal Safety and Acceptability Study of Tenofovir 1% Gel), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01232803 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1 Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Rectal Safety and Acceptability Study of Tenofovir 1% Gel

TypeinterventionalSponsorCONRADRan2010 to 2011Enrolled65ConditionsRectal MicrobicidesArmsTenofovir 1% gel, 2% N-9 gel, HEC Placebo gel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cheng-Shiun LeuHIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, NY State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 15, New York, NY, 10032, USA, cl94@columbia.edu.
Marina Mabragaña
Rebecca Giguere
Curtis Dolezal
Alex Carballo-Diéguez
Ian McGowan

Funding

Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2011 to 2021
$175.0M
Adol. Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS InterventionsU01HD040474 · NICHD · WESTAT, INC. · PI HARRIS, DONALD ROBERT · 2001 to 2016
$114.4M
Microbicide Trials NetworkU01AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2006 to 2010
$77.0M
LEADERSHIP GROUP FOR ADOLESCENT MEDICINE TRIALS NETWORKU01HD040533 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI WILSON, CRAIG M · 2001 to 2016
$76.4M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
The Statistics, Data Science, and Data Management (SDM) CoreP30MH043520 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI MILTON L WAINBERG · 2003 to 2026
$48.2M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstitutionKL2TR000146 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$8.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000146NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NIAID NIH HHS 5UM1AI068633NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068633NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068633NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD040474NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD040533NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH043520NIMH NIH HHS P30-MH43520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adherence measurement in microbicide trials is challenging. To decrease recall and social desirability bias, we used an interactive voice response system (IVR) in a rectal microbicide trial. Forty-six participants were asked to report product use daily for 1 week. Participants received an incentive per call plus a bonus for calling every day. We examined adherence to calling the IVR and to gel use; we compared the latter to applicator counts. Adherence to calling the IVR daily was high (mean = 89.9 %, SD = 20.7 %). Adherence to gel use per IVR was very good (mean = 90.7 %, SD = 19.1 %), and consistent with applicator counts in 80.4 % of cases. Neither adherence to calling nor gel use were associated with temporal factors like day calls started, number of days since first call, or weekday vs. weekend. Daily reporting allowed identification of irregular product use. IVR appears useful for daily reporting in brief trials.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultAlabamaAnti-Infective AgentsBostonDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient CompliancePhiladelphiaReminder SystemsSelf AdministrationAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID23842718
PMCPMC4157755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.