Trial reportJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2013
Physiology of endothelin in producing myocardial perfusion heterogeneity: a mechanistic study using darusentan and positron emission tomography.
Trial report in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00738049 (A Phase 2, Investigator-Initiated, Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Mechanisms of Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction Imaged As Resting Myocardial Perfusion Heterogeneity After Endothelin Receptor Blockade With Darusentan), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2, Investigator-Initiated, Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Mechanisms of Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction Imaged As Resting Myocardial Perfusion Heterogeneity After Endothelin Receptor Blockade With Darusentan
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Shedding Light on Treatment Options for Coronary Vasomotor Disorders: A Systematic Review.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Genetic dysregulation of endothelin-1 is implicated in coronary microvascular dysfunction.European heart journal · 2020Trial
- Focusing on microvascular function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Insights on Prognosis and Future Perspectives.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Molecular mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction in coronary microcirculation dysfunction.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2023Review
- Effects of Shexiang Baoxin Pill for Coronary Microvascular Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Outpatient Management of Patients With Angina With No Obstructive Coronary Arteries: How to Come to a Proper Diagnosis and Therapy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Rationale and design of the Medical Research Council's Precision Medicine with Zibotentan in Microvascular Angina (PRIZE) trial.American heart journal · 2020Article
- Assessment of Vascular Dysfunction in Patients Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Why, How, and When.JACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2020Review
- Treatment of coronary microvascular dysfunction.Cardiovascular research · 2020Review
- Small-Vessel Disease in the Heart and Brain: Current Knowledge, Unmet Therapeutic Need, and Future Directions.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Review
- Stable coronary syndromes: pathophysiology, diagnostic advances and therapeutic need.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2018Review
- Quantitative Coronary Physiology for Clinical Management: the Imaging Standard.Current cardiology reports · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeterogeneity of resting perfusion may be due in part to up-regulation of coronary vasoconstriction via endothelin (ET) type A receptors, as homogeneity increases during subsequent vasodilatory hyperemia. Therefore, we conducted a mechanistic study using an ET receptor antagonist to determine if it could alter the homogeneity of myocardial perfusion.
methodsIncluded subjects demonstrated a low myocardial perfusion homogeneity index (HI) compared to normal volunteers. Four serial cardiac positron emission tomography Rb-82 scans were performed 2 weeks apart. Before the middle two scans, subjects were randomized to receive either darusentan first then placebo or visa versa. Absolute flow and coronary flow reserve were quantified for each study. Rest flow was adjusted for the pressure-rate product (PRP).
resultsWe screened 37 subjects and randomized 20 who satisfied entry criteria. Rest HI increased significantly while taking darusentan (0.39 ± 0.10 vs 0.33 ± 0.04 on placebo, P = .030, compared to a normal range of 0.52 ± 0.10) without an increase in the PRP (6,859 ± 1,503 vs 6,976 ± 1,092, P = .79), leading to a higher adjusted flow at rest (0.69 ± 0.18 cc/minute/g at 7,000 PRP vs 0.59 ± 0.07 with placebo).
conclusionsAntagonism of the type A ET receptor increases homogeneity of resting myocardial perfusion. The mechanism appears to be increased absolute rest flow without an increase in either the PRP or myocardial perfusion during hyperemia. Our translational results are consistent with one mechanism for the observed heterogeneity of myocardial perfusion in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.