Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23841875›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2013

Deconstructing activation events in rhodopsin.

Elena N Laricheva, Karunesh Arora, Jennifer L Knight, Charles L Brooks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring pH Dependent Host/Guest Binding Affinities.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2020
    Article
  3. Computational Studies of Catalytic Loop Dynamics inThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Electrostatic Interactions in Folding of β-Proteins.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2016
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena N LarichevaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Karunesh Arora
Jennifer L Knight
Charles L Brooks
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Theoretical Studies of Receptor-Ligand InteractionsR01GM037554 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BROOKS, CHARLES L · 1987 to 2018
$3.8M
INTERACTIONS IN NONNATIVE STATES OF PROTEINSR01GM057513 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI CASE, DAVID A · 1998 to 2012
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM037554NIGMS NIH HHS GM057513NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037554NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activation of class-A G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) involves large-scale reorganization of the H3/H6 interhelical network. In rhodopsin (Rh), this process is coupled to a change in the protonation state of a key residue, E134, whose exact role in activation is not well understood. Capturing this millisecond pH-dependent process is a well-appreciated challenge. We have developed a scheme combining the harmonic Fourier beads (HFB) method and constant-pH molecular dynamics with pH-based replica exchange (pH-REX) to gain insight into the structural changes that occur along the activation pathway as a function of the protonation state of E134. Our results indicate that E134 is protonated as a consequence of tilting of H6 by ca. 4.0° with respect to its initial position and simultaneous rotation by ca. 23° along its principal axis. The movement of H6 is associated with breakage of the E247-R135 and R135-E134 salt bridges and concomitant release of the E134 side chain, which results in an increase in its pKa value above physiological pH. An increase in the hydrophobicity of the environment surrounding E134 leads to further tilting and rotation of H6 and upshift of the E134 pKa. Such atomic-level information, which is not accessible through experiments, refines the earlier proposed sequential model of Rh activation (see: Zaitseva, E.; et al. Sequential Rearrangement of Interhelical Networks Upon Rhodopsin Activation in Membranes: The Meta IIa Conformational Substate . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 4815) and argues that the E134 protonation switch is both a cause and a consequence of the H6 motion.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationRhodopsinTime FactorsRhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID23841875
PMCPMC3774788
OpenAlexW2095034168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.